From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
jakub@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:27:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226.Juthoojee3qu@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223160259.22c61d1e@kernel.org>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:02:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:22:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all
> > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they
> > expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return
> > codes to pass/fail/skip.
> >
> > Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes
> > under kselftest_harness.
> >
> > Merge plan is to put it on top of -rc4 and merge into net-next.
> > That way others should be able to pull the patches without
> > any networking changes.
>
> Hi Mickaël,
>
> would you be able to take a look at those changes? landlock seems to be
> the sole user of the "no_print" functionality in the selftest harness.
> If the patches look good I'll create a branch based on Linus's tree
> so that anyone interested can pull the changes in..
Hi Jakub,
I missed your patches before this series. I just sent two patches to
clean things up before you change them. This should simplify your
patches and improve the overall maintenance. I'd appreciate if you
rebase on top of them.
Regards,
Mickaël
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 19:22 [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: pass step via shared memory Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: use KSFT_* exit codes Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: generate test name once Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: save full exit code in metadata Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: use exit code to store skip Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:49 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/11] selftests: kselftest: add ksft_test_result_code(), handling all exit codes Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:49 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: print test name for SKIP Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:50 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: separate diagnostic message with # in ksft_test_result_code() Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:50 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: let PASS / FAIL provide diagnostic Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:52 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 0:52 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-20 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Paolo Abeni
2024-02-23 17:48 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-24 0:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-26 16:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] Merge TEST_F_FORK() into TEST_F() Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-26 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/landlock: Redefine TEST_F() as TEST_F_FORK() Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-26 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/harness: Merge TEST_F_FORK() into TEST_F() Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-26 19:04 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-26 20:21 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-26 16:27 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-02-26 16:53 ` [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240226.Juthoojee3qu@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).