From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch [84.16.66.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB1F112BEBD for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708964873; cv=none; b=pZEenC2EnFpN+fspHKu9qecwkfks3ZckHcLwPbmihDRZ8jMMEVAnchovovXZPZszwNniQobjcf8TfUeZyReQxGKKQ9Qo7bUSXXKI51FLfAy+Na0eKXiLCNzWp8HQ2gm9mPBHd56jHSXNj4RCPs069BMtWWdp9413DieFNjDNln4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708964873; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9oIJaUSzzlfVyV6JEd/5V+zZ2B5DVJZOSdtTGUS1/DA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JcPZb+0w67JEIopcjCea0xVmez1JqBLgGtEo9cbcjX++mPBG3UXoXQITq7bkFUu056jjLXy5gmQuExN0PVBhml4QOwRcvfq0gYzqXUuuxBxLb+TzmEvPlLGDSgS6lwLyU07tuIeiYwi6Kjp7zIxKWUQ/Ww0BDx5WT9V7S08Pjh4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=zYEG/ovZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="zYEG/ovZ" Received: from smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.7.10.107]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tk5ct5KzYz7kl; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:27:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Tk5ct1T5kz8JZ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:27:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1708964862; bh=9oIJaUSzzlfVyV6JEd/5V+zZ2B5DVJZOSdtTGUS1/DA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=zYEG/ovZoEHk3G1dlz0YQyNIvsDRQNqe1gt7Eygn5EZTGo/wfWYNkmjzUjcQH+O4R VfG5q3Dg5EQWoAcyg206oeap9fRk/sYXi9hYZfN/RdGPsLklur7SCsUJ4ZlVub3DGM aecKX9zgbRozPacZWnTWRb2BqG3CgpKZrkO7qE8g= Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:27:34 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, jakub@cloudflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Message-ID: <20240226.Juthoojee3qu@digikod.net> References: <20240220192235.2953484-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20240223160259.22c61d1e@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240223160259.22c61d1e@kernel.org> X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:02:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:22:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > > expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return > > codes to pass/fail/skip. > > > > Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes > > under kselftest_harness. > > > > Merge plan is to put it on top of -rc4 and merge into net-next. > > That way others should be able to pull the patches without > > any networking changes. > > Hi Mickaël, > > would you be able to take a look at those changes? landlock seems to be > the sole user of the "no_print" functionality in the selftest harness. > If the patches look good I'll create a branch based on Linus's tree > so that anyone interested can pull the changes in.. Hi Jakub, I missed your patches before this series. I just sent two patches to clean things up before you change them. This should simplify your patches and improve the overall maintenance. I'd appreciate if you rebase on top of them. Regards, Mickaël