From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9067B7D06E; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 23:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709595544; cv=none; b=HAAtvaywxjtSBluZsT0FGPyxKjyW3ic50PQ3Vjdh/wYelTIjXkKbu4rP4+in51j63K2YRiGgE/LNi1mZk9Pt1z2Lc+lSXFxCpH7KYyLzYve4nKIc/fdJPz9hGvsgy4tyTtv1zJLljXM+itHc8ZDCSn48B/K+goQniON906HlIJA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709595544; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ilwqlWqCQDWZzjycLw1f8qmydL+kgbSGdmaBJ2z2whw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ta0szmNAVqWql8JMhKPpe8SEyGnaseuvu08BrDOfN9PybGihdO0DqlzqfiFN/tveeTJLync/41TqwihQvGhxjO3AsFG9rUrDMYSCsg87nLdpP8unltGfqZAsdgSz2wc3mtiu5ybvltzMGxtdL6fUxvIrA/lsOSyXGA1wyQtezus= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YNkU4TeL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YNkU4TeL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9505C433F1; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 23:39:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709595544; bh=ilwqlWqCQDWZzjycLw1f8qmydL+kgbSGdmaBJ2z2whw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YNkU4TeLvFE/zlGE9KlnZd/DFXPQD3s5dEiePHEK+szo5zzhTlxbxi7NGGsDvCjGM 2ARjaJOgLP/QeUDAZ5R7v+FASS6PLD5AqhGUqpoRltqMdd3q62sn88exyEc9qB01eW gSQxkfg9/thZjnnsJLd4igYlPBPzaXVxUSbGYGHmrbIhUctd2PLcVh5w/IOy52kV6g CGkAezNo6vpPnAsfVH3E4P3CP9Ob8QZLcwZa8qU7ppNiw24SgtWX+fpJw7w/ASEcJ3 qnF4MCCxCHyw1n04L/aQHYtLnV+mWJYBWyo9qeQVdu2uPVAFLcnAPtnNwVzS8jOcs8 KVH6Fe8SUW0lg== Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:39:02 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kees Cook Cc: Mark Brown , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mic@digikod.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Message-ID: <20240304153902.30cd2edd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <202403041512.402C08D@keescook> References: <20240229005920.2407409-1-kuba@kernel.org> <05f7bf89-04a5-4b65-bf59-c19456aeb1f0@sirena.org.uk> <20240304150411.6a9bd50b@kernel.org> <202403041512.402C08D@keescook> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > Ugh, I'm guessing vfork() "eats" the signal, IOW grandchild signals, > > child exits? vfork() and signals.. I'd rather leave to Kees || Mickael.= =20 >=20 > Oh no, that does seem bad. Since Micka=C3=ABl is also seeing weird issues, > can we drop the vfork changes for now? Seems doable, but won't be a simple revert. "drop" means we'd need=20 to bring ->step back. More or less go back to v3. No preference here, Mickael?