From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] evm: stop avoidably reading i_writecount in evm_file_release
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:36:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806133607.869394-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
The EVM_NEW_FILE flag is unset if the file already existed at the time
of open and this can be checked without looking at i_writecount.
Not accessing it reduces traffic on the cacheline during parallel open
of the same file and drop the evm_file_release routine from second place
to bottom of the profile.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
The context is that I'm writing a patch which removes one lockref
get/put cycle on parallel open. An operational WIP reduces ping-pong in
that area and made do_dentry_open skyrocket along with evm_file_release,
due to i_writecount access. With the patch they go down again and
apparmor takes the rightful first place.
The patch accounts for about 5% speed up at 20 cores running open3 from
will-it-scale on top of the above wip. (the apparmor + lockref thing
really don't scale, that's next)
I would provide better measurements, but the wip is not ready (as the
description suggests) and I need evm out of the way for the actual
patch.
security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index 62fe66dd53ce..309630f319e2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,8 @@ static void evm_file_release(struct file *file)
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || !(mode & FMODE_WRITE))
return;
- if (iint && atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
+ if (iint && iint->flags & EVM_NEW_FILE &&
+ atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
iint->flags &= ~EVM_NEW_FILE;
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 13:36 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2024-08-16 11:53 ` [PATCH] evm: stop avoidably reading i_writecount in evm_file_release Roberto Sassu
2024-09-23 5:26 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-09-24 11:56 ` Roberto Sassu
2024-10-10 3:00 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240806133607.869394-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).