From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:04:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408081104.8805C0BC7@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240808155931.1290349-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:59:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
> is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
> This results in test failures such as:
>
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
> Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
> array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
> (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
> not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
> Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
> array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
> (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
> # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>
> Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
>
> Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-08 15:59 [PATCH] apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems Guenter Roeck
2024-08-08 18:04 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-08-12 16:55 ` John Johansen
2024-08-12 17:07 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202408081104.8805C0BC7@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox