linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, gnoack@google.com,
	paul@paul-moore.com,  jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
	jannh@google.com,  netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] selftest/Landlock: pthread_kill(3) tests
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:40:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240826.ToP3fahphub1@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240820.eesaifai6Goo@digikod.net>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Please make sure all subject's prefixes are correct, there is two errors
> in the prefix and the description can be made more consistent with other
> patches, something like this: "selftests/landlock: Add
> signal_scoping_threads test"
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:29:23PM -0600, Tahera Fahimi wrote:
> > This patch expands the signal scoping tests with pthread_kill(3)
> > It tests if an scoped thread can send signal to a process in
> > the same scoped domain, or a non-sandboxed thread.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > index 92958c6266ca..2edba1e6cd82 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  #include <errno.h>
> >  #include <fcntl.h>
> >  #include <linux/landlock.h>
> > +#include <pthread.h>
> >  #include <signal.h>
> >  #include <sys/prctl.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> > @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  
> > +#define DEFAULT_THREAD_RUNTIME 0.001
> >  static sig_atomic_t signaled;
> >  
> >  static void create_signal_domain(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata)
> > @@ -299,4 +301,31 @@ TEST_F(signal_scoping, test_signal)
> >  		_metadata->exit_code = KSFT_FAIL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void *thread_func(void *arg)
> > +{
> > +	sleep(DEFAULT_THREAD_RUNTIME);
> 
> Using sleep() may make this test flaky.  It needs to be removed and the
> test should work the same.
> 
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +TEST(signal_scoping_threads)
> > +{
> > +	pthread_t no_sandbox_thread, scoped_thread;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(0,
> > +		  pthread_create(&no_sandbox_thread, NULL, thread_func, NULL));
> > +	create_signal_domain(_metadata);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&scoped_thread, NULL, thread_func, NULL));
> > +
> > +	/* Send signal to threads */
> > +	err = pthread_kill(no_sandbox_thread, 0);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(EPERM, err);

Sometime the test failed because err == 0, I guess it's because I
removed the call to sleep(), but this just highlight a race condition in
the code anyway.  We would need a synchronization primitive to make sure
the thread is still alive, something like the pipe read/write.

> > +
> > +	err = pthread_kill(scoped_thread, 0);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(0, err);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(scoped_thread, NULL));
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(no_sandbox_thread, NULL));
> > +}
> > +
> >  TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 18:29 [PATCH v3 0/6] Landlock: Signal Scoping Support Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Landlock: Add signal control Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Landlock: Adding file_send_sigiotask signal scoping support Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 20:25   ` Jann Horn
2024-08-15 21:28     ` Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 22:10       ` Jann Horn
2024-08-15 23:06         ` Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-19 17:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-21 10:13   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] selftest/Landlock: Signal restriction tests Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-20 15:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-26 12:40   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] selftest/Landlock: pthread_kill(3) tests Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-20 15:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-26 12:40     ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sample/Landlock: Support signal scoping restriction Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Landlock: Document LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 21:07   ` Tahera Fahimi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240826.ToP3fahphub1@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=fahimitahera@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).