Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lsm sb_delete hook, was Re: [PATCH 4/7] vfs: Convert sb->s_inodes iteration to super_iter_inodes()
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003122657.mrqwyc5tzeggrzbt@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zv6J34fwj3vNOrIH@infradead.org>

On Thu 03-10-24 05:11:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 01:57:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Fair enough. If we go with the iterator variant I've suggested to Dave in
> > [1], we could combine the evict_inodes(), fsnotify_unmount_inodes() and
> > Landlocks hook_sb_delete() into a single iteration relatively easily. But
> > I'd wait with that convertion until this series lands.
> 
> I don't see how that has anything to do with iterators or not.

Well, the patches would obviously conflict which seems pointless if we
could live with three iterations for a few years until somebody noticed :).
And with current Dave's version of iterators it will not be possible to
integrate evict_inodes() iteration with the other two without a layering
violation. Still we could go from 3 to 2 iterations.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-03 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241002014017.3801899-1-david@fromorbit.com>
     [not found] ` <20241002014017.3801899-5-david@fromorbit.com>
2024-10-03  7:23   ` lsm sb_delete hook, was Re: [PATCH 4/7] vfs: Convert sb->s_inodes iteration to super_iter_inodes() Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03  7:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 11:57       ` Jan Kara
2024-10-03 12:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 12:26           ` Jan Kara [this message]
2024-10-03 12:39             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 12:56               ` Jan Kara
2024-10-03 13:04                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 13:59                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-03 16:17                   ` Jan Kara
2024-10-04  0:46                     ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-04  7:21                       ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-04 12:14                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 13:49                           ` Jan Kara
2024-10-04 18:15                             ` Paul Moore
2024-10-04 22:57                         ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-05 15:21                           ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-05 16:03                             ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-05 16:03                             ` Paul Moore
2024-10-07 20:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-07 23:33           ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-08  0:28             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-08  0:54               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-09  9:49                 ` Jan Kara
2024-10-08 12:59               ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-09  0:21                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-09  9:23                   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-08  8:57             ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-08 11:23               ` Jan Kara
2024-10-08 12:16                 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-09  0:03                   ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-08 23:44                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-09  6:10                   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-09 14:18                   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241003122657.mrqwyc5tzeggrzbt@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox