From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
Cc: gnoack@google.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
matthieu@buffet.re, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
yusongping@huawei.com, artem.kuzin@huawei.com,
konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] landlock: Fix inconsistency of errors for TCP actions
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:32:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204.ibahfoo6thuG@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017110454.265818-4-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
Something is wrong with this patch.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:04:49PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> Add two helpers for TCP bind/connect accesses, which will serve to perform
> action-specific network stack level checks and safely extract the port from
> the address.
>
> Return -EAFNOSUPPORT instead of -EINVAL in sin_family checks.
>
> Check socket state before validating address for TCP connect access. This
> is necessary to follow the error order of network stack.
>
> Read sk_family value from socket structure with READ_ONCE to safely handle
> IPV6_ADDRFORM case (see [1]).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240202095404.183274-1-edumazet@google.com/
>
> Fixes: fff69fb03dde ("landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect")
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
> ---
> security/landlock/net.c | 543 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 315 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
> rewrite security/landlock/net.c (37%)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
> dissimilarity index 37%
> index a3142f9b15ee..06791aba9196 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/net.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
> @@ -1,228 +1,315 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> -/*
> - * Landlock LSM - Network management and hooks
> - *
> - * Copyright © 2022-2023 Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd.
> - * Copyright © 2022-2023 Microsoft Corporation
> - */
> -
> -#include <linux/in.h>
> -#include <linux/net.h>
> -#include <linux/socket.h>
> -#include <net/ipv6.h>
> -
> -#include "common.h"
> -#include "cred.h"
> -#include "limits.h"
> -#include "net.h"
> -#include "ruleset.h"
> -
> -int landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> - const u16 port, access_mask_t access_rights)
> -{
> - int err;
> - const struct landlock_id id = {
> - .key.data = (__force uintptr_t)htons(port),
> - .type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> - };
> -
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> -
> - /* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */
> - access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET &
> - ~landlock_get_net_access_mask(ruleset, 0);
> -
> - mutex_lock(&ruleset->lock);
> - err = landlock_insert_rule(ruleset, id, access_rights);
> - mutex_unlock(&ruleset->lock);
> -
> - return err;
> -}
> -
> -static const struct landlock_ruleset *get_current_net_domain(void)
> -{
> - const union access_masks any_net = {
> - .net = ~0,
> - };
> -
> - return landlock_match_ruleset(landlock_get_current_domain(), any_net);
> -}
> -
> -static int check_access_port(const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom,
> - __be16 port, access_mask_t access_request)
> -{
> - layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET] = {};
> - const struct landlock_rule *rule;
> - struct landlock_id id = {
> - .type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> - };
> -
> - id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> -
> - rule = landlock_find_rule(dom, id);
> - access_request = landlock_init_layer_masks(
> - dom, access_request, &layer_masks, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> - if (landlock_unmask_layers(rule, access_request, &layer_masks,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(layer_masks)))
> - return 0;
> -
> - return -EACCES;
> -}
> -
> -static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> - struct sockaddr *const address, const int addrlen)
> -{
> - __be16 port;
> - struct sock *const sk = sock->sk;
> - const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom = get_current_net_domain();
> -
> - if (!dom)
> - return 0;
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dom->num_layers < 1))
> - return -EACCES;
> -
> - if (sk_is_tcp(sk)) {
> - /* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */
> - if (addrlen < offsetofend(typeof(*address), sa_family))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - switch (address->sa_family) {
> - case AF_UNSPEC:
> - case AF_INET:
> - if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)address)->sin_port;
> - break;
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> - case AF_INET6:
> - if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - port = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)address)->sin6_port;
> - break;
> -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> -
> - default:
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
> - * accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
> - * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). Checking the address is
> - * required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
> - * -EAFNOSUPPORT.
> - *
> - * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle these
> - * checks, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
> - * consistency thanks to kselftest.
> - */
> - if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) {
> - /* addrlen has already been checked for AF_UNSPEC. */
> - const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
> - (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
> -
> - if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
> - return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
> - * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
> - * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
> - *
> - * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
> - * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
> - * consistency thanks to kselftest.
> - */
> - if (address->sa_family != sk->sk_family)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - return check_access_port(dom, port,
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP);
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> - struct sockaddr *const address,
> - const int addrlen)
> -{
> - __be16 port;
> - struct sock *const sk = sock->sk;
> - const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom = get_current_net_domain();
> -
> - if (!dom)
> - return 0;
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dom->num_layers < 1))
> - return -EACCES;
> -
> - if (sk_is_tcp(sk)) {
> - /* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */
> - if (addrlen < offsetofend(typeof(*address), sa_family))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - switch (address->sa_family) {
> - case AF_UNSPEC:
> - case AF_INET:
> - if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)address)->sin_port;
> - break;
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> - case AF_INET6:
> - if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - port = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)address)->sin6_port;
> - break;
> -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> -
> - default:
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
> - * association, which have the same effect as closing the
> - * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
> - * descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
> - * connections is always allowed.
> - *
> - * For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
> - * Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
> - * return -EINVAL if needed.
> - */
> - if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC)
> - return 0;
> - /*
> - * Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
> - * -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
> - * only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
> - *
> - * We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
> - * check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
> - * consistency thanks to kselftest.
> - */
> - if (address->sa_family != sk->sk_family)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return check_access_port(dom, port,
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP);
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> - LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_bind, hook_socket_bind),
> - LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_connect, hook_socket_connect),
> -};
> -
> -__init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
> -{
> - security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> - &landlock_lsmid);
> -}
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Landlock LSM - Network management and hooks
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2022-2023 Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright © 2022-2023 Microsoft Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/in.h>
> +#include <linux/net.h>
> +#include <linux/socket.h>
> +#include <net/ipv6.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "cred.h"
> +#include "limits.h"
> +#include "net.h"
> +#include "ruleset.h"
> +
> +int landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> + const u16 port, access_mask_t access_rights)
> +{
> + int err;
> + const struct landlock_id id = {
> + .key.data = (__force uintptr_t)htons(port),
> + .type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> + };
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> +
> + /* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */
> + access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET &
> + ~landlock_get_net_access_mask(ruleset, 0);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ruleset->lock);
> + err = landlock_insert_rule(ruleset, id, access_rights);
> + mutex_unlock(&ruleset->lock);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct landlock_ruleset *get_current_net_domain(void)
> +{
> + const union access_masks any_net = {
> + .net = ~0,
> + };
> +
> + return landlock_match_ruleset(landlock_get_current_domain(), any_net);
> +}
> +
> +static int check_access_port(const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom,
> + __be16 port, access_mask_t access_request)
> +{
> + layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET] = {};
> + const struct landlock_rule *rule;
> + struct landlock_id id = {
> + .type = LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT,
> + };
> +
> + id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));
> +
> + rule = landlock_find_rule(dom, id);
> + access_request = landlock_init_layer_masks(
> + dom, access_request, &layer_masks, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> + if (landlock_unmask_layers(rule, access_request, &layer_masks,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(layer_masks)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -EACCES;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Checks that TCP @sock and @address attributes are correct for bind(2).
> + *
> + * On success, extracts port from @address in @port and returns 0.
> + *
> + * This validation is consistent with network stack and returns the error
> + * in the order corresponding to the order of errors from the network stack.
> + * It's required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of meaningful network
> + * stack level errors. Consistency is tested with kselftest.
> + *
> + * This helper does not provide consistency of error codes for BPF filter
> + * (if any).
> + */
> +static int
> +check_tcp_bind_consistency_and_get_port(struct socket *const sock,
> + struct sockaddr *const address,
> + const int addrlen, __be16 *port)
> +{
> + /* IPV6_ADDRFORM can change sk->sk_family under us. */
> + switch (READ_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_family)) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + const struct sockaddr_in *const addr =
> + (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
> +
> + /* Cf. inet_bind_sk(). */
> + if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
> + * accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
> + * INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind).
> + */
> + if (addr->sin_family != AF_INET) {
> + if (addr->sin_family != AF_UNSPEC ||
> + addr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> + }
> + *port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)address)->sin_port;
> + break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case AF_INET6:
> + /* Cf. inet6_bind_sk(). */
> + if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /* Cf. __inet6_bind(). */
> + if (address->sa_family != AF_INET6)
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> + *port = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)address)->sin6_port;
> + break;
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(0);
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Checks that TCP @sock and @address attributes are correct for connect(2).
> + *
> + * On success, extracts port from @address in @port and returns 0.
> + *
> + * This validation is consistent with network stack and returns the error
> + * in the order corresponding to the order of errors from the network stack.
> + * It's required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of meaningful network
> + * stack level error. Consistency is partially tested with kselftest.
> + *
> + * This helper does not provide consistency of error codes for BPF filter
> + * (if any).
> + *
> + * The function holds socket lock while checking the socket state.
> + */
> +static int
> +check_tcp_connect_consistency_and_get_port(struct socket *const sock,
> + struct sockaddr *const address,
> + const int addrlen, __be16 *port)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> + struct sock *const sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + /* Cf. __inet_stream_connect(). */
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + switch (sock->state) {
> + default:
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + case SS_CONNECTED:
> + err = -EISCONN;
> + break;
> + case SS_CONNECTING:
> + /*
> + * Calling connect(2) on nonblocking socket with SYN_SENT or SYN_RECV
> + * state immediately returns -EISCONN and -EALREADY (Cf. __inet_stream_connect()).
> + *
> + * This check is not tested with kselftests.
> + */
> + if ((sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
> + ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV))) {
> + if (inet_test_bit(DEFER_CONNECT, sk))
> + err = -EISCONN;
> + else
> + err = -EALREADY;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Current state is possible in two cases:
> + * 1. connect(2) is called upon nonblocking socket and previous
> + * connection attempt was closed by RST packet (therefore socket is
> + * in TCP_CLOSE state). In this case connect(2) calls
> + * sk_prot->disconnect(), changes socket state and increases number
> + * of disconnects.
> + * 2. connect(2) is called twice upon socket with TCP_FASTOPEN_CONNECT
> + * option set. If socket state is TCP_CLOSE connect(2) does the
> + * same logic as in point 1 case. Otherwise connect(2) may freeze
> + * after inet_wait_for_connect() call since SYN was never sent.
> + *
> + * For both this cases Landlock cannot provide error consistency since
> + * 1. Both cases involve executing some network stack logic and changing
> + * the socket state.
> + * 2. It cannot omit access check and allow network stack handle error
> + * consistency since socket can change its state to SS_UNCONNECTED
> + * before it will be locked again in inet_stream_connect().
> + *
> + * Therefore it is only possible to return 0 and check access right with
> + * check_access_port() helper.
> + */
> + release_sock(sk);
> + return 0;
> + case SS_UNCONNECTED:
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE)
> + err = -EISCONN;
> + break;
> + }
> + release_sock(sk);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* IPV6_ADDRFORM can change sk->sk_family under us. */
> + switch (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_family)) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + /* Cf. tcp_v4_connect(). */
> + if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (address->sa_family != AF_INET)
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +
> + *port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)address)->sin_port;
> + break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case AF_INET6:
> + /* Cf. tcp_v6_connect(). */
> + if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (address->sa_family != AF_INET6)
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +
> + *port = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)address)->sin6_port;
> + break;
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(0);
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> + struct sockaddr *const address, const int addrlen)
> +{
> + int err;
> + __be16 port;
> + const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom = get_current_net_domain();
> +
> + if (!dom)
> + return 0;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dom->num_layers < 1))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + if (sk_is_tcp(sock->sk)) {
> + err = check_tcp_bind_consistency_and_get_port(sock, address,
> + addrlen, &port);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + return check_access_port(dom, port,
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> + struct sockaddr *const address,
> + const int addrlen)
> +{
> + int err;
> + __be16 port;
> + const struct landlock_ruleset *const dom = get_current_net_domain();
> +
> + if (!dom)
> + return 0;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dom->num_layers < 1))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + if (sk_is_tcp(sock->sk)) {
> + /* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */
> + if (addrlen < sizeof(address->sa_family))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
> + * association, which have the same effect as closing the
> + * connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
> + * descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
> + * connections is always allowed.
> + *
> + * For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
> + * Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
> + * return -EINVAL if needed.
> + */
> + if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = check_tcp_connect_consistency_and_get_port(
> + sock, address, addrlen, &port);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + return check_access_port(dom, port,
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_bind, hook_socket_bind),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_connect, hook_socket_connect),
> +};
> +
> +__init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
> +{
> + security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> + &landlock_lsmid);
> +}
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 11:04 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Fix non-TCP restriction and inconsistency of TCP errors Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] landlock: Fix non-TCP sockets restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 12:59 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-10-18 18:08 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-31 16:21 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-11-08 17:16 ` David Laight
2024-12-04 19:29 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-12 18:43 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-13 18:19 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-24 15:02 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-27 12:40 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-27 19:48 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-28 10:56 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-28 18:14 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-29 9:52 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-29 10:25 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-29 11:02 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-29 11:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-29 11:47 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-29 11:57 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-29 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-29 15:44 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-30 9:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-30 10:18 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-01-31 11:04 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-04 19:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-04 19:35 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-09 10:19 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-10 18:04 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-10 18:05 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-11 15:24 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-12 18:43 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-13 11:42 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-04 19:30 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-09 10:19 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] landlock: Make network stack layer checks explicit for each TCP action Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] landlock: Fix inconsistency of errors for TCP actions Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:34 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 12:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-11-06 9:27 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-04 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] selftests/landlock: Test TCP accesses with protocol=IPPROTO_TCP Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] selftests/landlock: Test that MPTCP actions are not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] selftests/landlock: Test consistency of errors for TCP actions Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-10 18:07 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-11 15:29 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] landlock: Add note about errors consistency in documentation Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-10 18:08 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-11 15:30 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-17 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] selftests/landlock: Test that SCTP actions are not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204.ibahfoo6thuG@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=artem.kuzin@huawei.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).