From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch [84.16.66.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B1C1AAA3D for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737718596; cv=none; b=QBC02CElgFyMsWAgKWIdexVg7axR4emlXwwfHmcC90bkpjM22uMOuAYQoX+l5FYwc8ZYcJG2zp7mMuM7JxbP0z06Og7o+g73qbmTszyIQDGKkLfSOOaVDy1fCjTDR5gpCfKfYaGAM0xPWJLkloDOgnrzJqRF/2X/zOHuJLIywao= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737718596; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c8v0iSP3uPz1sHXkNSRfQ9ZSki5mQZWo4zBufiK0DmU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WjJuKgPkz+9GbmrvzD+K/0eARdtyp1K0qTtjYbFo3Z6jL58zc4nETxP8cA+KljxSzcuwUxVFKwJwmeK8InGogbfTyZNwoefqJPAyCcdzsY3KI5nIQg0mqAh6gLzLlAWFVlwRyju0uQIvICb6YyVU4N5IVhj59uKUu/UTg8ScO3Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=ORxxd2/Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="ORxxd2/Z" Received: from smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.7.10.107]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YfbP40nvzzhJ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:36:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1737718584; bh=Yh+2ivu71VmKgJUy4kfSxaoQdkA2KaxGAolLf4ZizBM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ORxxd2/ZevHevUkY+hweA3VuJW8TgTymLzJof3br2Kj5rxDzwrEmZhvxwW1BIj2R/ 3xGjzjaN1WyVkH1Vy0JS2vfwXzuUaFrnBto7xdkyhcqgw3knL5mhlSestGljgEvyCI rSQpVh6NIMvKxcIr5Sw5cu0rMREYxPe7D9Efe2Qw= Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4YfbP25t0vzXtS; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:36:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:36:22 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Tanya Agarwal Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, gnoack@google.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] landlock: fix grammar and spelling error Message-ID: <20250124.Zohthoogh7aN@digikod.net> References: <20250123194208.2660-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250123194208.2660-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com> X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:12:10AM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote: > From: Tanya Agarwal > > Fix grammar and spelling error in landlock module comments that were > identified using the codespell tool. > No functional changes - documentation only. > > Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar I think Mimi's tag was for the IMA part, so I'll remove it. > --- > Original discussion: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250112072925.1774-1-tanyaagarwal25699@gmail.com > > This patch set is split into individual patches for each LSM > to facilitate easier review by respective maintainers. > > security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c > index a93bdbf52fff..c464d1f84792 100644 > --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c > +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ create_rule(const struct landlock_id id, > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > RB_CLEAR_NODE(&new_rule->node); > if (is_object_pointer(id.type)) { > - /* This should be catched by insert_rule(). */ > + /* This should have been caught by insert_rule(). */ > WARN_ON_ONCE(!id.key.object); > landlock_get_object(id.key.object); > } Thanks, I'll take it in my tree.