Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	 andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net,  martin.lau@linux.dev,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	 mattbobrowski@google.com, liamwisehart@meta.com,
	shankaran@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: fs/xattr: Add BPF kfuncs to set and remove xattrs
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:53:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250128-hochhalten-ankam-6dcb5832a316@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250124202911.3264715-7-song@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:29:10PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> Add the following kfuncs to set and remove xattrs from BPF programs:
> 
>   bpf_set_dentry_xattr
>   bpf_remove_dentry_xattr
>   bpf_set_dentry_xattr_locked
>   bpf_remove_dentry_xattr_locked
> 
> The _locked version of these kfuncs are called from hooks where
> dentry->d_inode is already locked. Instead of requiring the user
> to know which version of the kfuncs to use, the verifier will pick
> the proper kfunc based on the calling hook.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> ---

Seems ok to me,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-28 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-24 20:29 [PATCH v10 bpf-next 0/7] Enable writing xattr from BPF programs Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 1/7] fs/xattr: bpf: Introduce security.bpf. xattr name prefix Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 2/7] selftests/bpf: Extend test fs_kfuncs to cover security.bpf. xattr names Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: lsm: Add two more sleepable hooks Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 4/7] bpf: Extend btf_kfunc_id_set to handle kfunc polymorphism Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: Use btf_kfunc_id_set.remap logic for bpf_dynptr_from_skb Song Liu
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: fs/xattr: Add BPF kfuncs to set and remove xattrs Song Liu
2025-01-28 10:53   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2025-01-24 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test kfuncs that set and remove xattr from BPF programs Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250128-hochhalten-ankam-6dcb5832a316@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
    --cc=shankaran@meta.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox