public inbox for linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:13:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409185019.238841-39-paul@paul-moore.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:49:53PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> The LSM currently has a lot of code to maintain a list of the
> currently active LSMs in a human readable string, with the only
> user being the "/sys/kernel/security/lsm" code.  Let's drop all
> of that code and generate the string on an as-needed basis when
> userspace reads "/sys/kernel/security/lsm".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h |  1 -
>  security/inode.c          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  security/lsm_init.c       | 49 ---------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 4cd17c9a229f..bc477fb20d02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct lsm_info {
>  
>  
>  /* DO NOT tamper with these variables outside of the LSM framework */
> -extern char *lsm_names;
>  extern struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init;
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
> index da3ab44c8e57..49bc3578bd23 100644
> --- a/security/inode.c
> +++ b/security/inode.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>  #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
>  
> +#include "lsm.h"
> +
>  static struct vfsmount *mount;
>  static int mount_count;
>  
> @@ -343,8 +345,29 @@ static struct dentry *lsm_dentry;
>  static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>  			loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> -	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names,
> -		strlen(lsm_names));
> +	int i;
> +	char *str;
> +	ssize_t rc, len = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < lsm_count; i++)
> +		/* the '+ 1' accounts for either a comma or a NUL terminator */
> +		len += strlen(lsm_order[i]->id->name) + 1;
> +
> +	str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!str)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	str[0] = '\0';
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +	while (i < lsm_count) {
> +		strcat(str, lsm_order[i]->id->name);
> +		if (++i < lsm_count)
> +			strcat(str, ",");
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, str, len);
> +	kfree(str);
> +	return rc;

Hrm, at least cache it?

static char *lsm_names;
static ssize_t lsm_names_len;

static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
			loff_t *ppos)
{
	if (!lsm_names) {
		int i;
		char *str;
		ssize_t len = 0;
		...
		lsm_names = str;
	}

	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names, lsm_names_len);
}

Better yet, do this whole thing in a initcall after LSMs are loaded, and
both can gain __ro_after_init...

>  
>  static const struct file_operations lsm_ops = {
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 981ddb20f48e..978bb81b58fa 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
>  
>  #include "lsm.h"
>  
> -char *lsm_names;
> -
>  /* Pointers to LSM sections defined in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h */
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_lsm_info[], __end_lsm_info[];
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
> @@ -363,42 +361,6 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *lsm)
> -{
> -	const char *last;
> -
> -	if (WARN_ON(!list || !lsm))
> -		return false;
> -	last = strrchr(list, ',');
> -	if (last)
> -		/* Pass the comma, strcmp() will check for '\0' */
> -		last++;
> -	else
> -		last = list;
> -	return !strcmp(last, lsm);
> -}
> -
> -static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
> -{
> -	char *cp;
> -
> -	if (*result == NULL) {
> -		*result = kstrdup(new, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (*result == NULL)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -	} else {
> -		/* Check if it is the last registered name */
> -		if (match_last_lsm(*result, new))
> -			return 0;
> -		cp = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", *result, new);
> -		if (cp == NULL)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -		kfree(*result);
> -		*result = cp;
> -	}
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void __init lsm_static_call_init(struct security_hook_list *hl)
>  {
>  	struct lsm_static_call *scall = hl->scalls;
> @@ -435,15 +397,6 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>  		hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
>  		lsm_static_call_init(&hooks[i]);
>  	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Don't try to append during early_security_init(), we'll come back
> -	 * and fix this up afterwards.
> -	 */
> -	if (slab_is_available()) {
> -		if (lsm_append(lsmid->name, &lsm_names) < 0)
> -			panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  int __init early_security_init(void)
> @@ -480,8 +433,6 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  	lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		init_debug("  early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->id->name,
>  			   is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> -		if (lsm->enabled)
> -			lsm_append(lsm->id->name, &lsm_names);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Load LSMs in specified order. */
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 18:49 [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:17   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 12:14   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:18   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:01   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] lsm: simplify prepare_lsm() and rename to lsm_prep_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:30   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 21:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:10   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] lsm: simplify ordered_lsm_init() and rename to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 22:31     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:40   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:20   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM order symbols naming Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:00   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:23   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 21:58     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:06   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 22:04     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 22:25       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  0:58         ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:13   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-04-10 22:47     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:15       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  3:14         ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:30       ` John Johansen
2025-05-22 21:26   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM enabled functions Paul Moore
2025-04-10  0:11   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:50     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:03       ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:14       ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:17         ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:29   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:02   ` John Johansen
2025-04-19  2:42   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-19  5:53     ` Kees Cook
2025-04-19 15:58       ` Fan Wu
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:30   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:04   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM ordered parsing Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] lsm: add missing function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-05-14 10:10   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:01   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:16   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 20:52     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:59   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:39   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:15     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:16       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:41         ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:57   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:40   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-14 21:19   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15  1:58     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:02   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:42   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:30     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 17:30   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 17:47     ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-11 20:09     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-14 21:04   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15  1:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 12:05   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 19:20     ` Micah Morton
2025-04-11 20:45       ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:18   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:33   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:31   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/29] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-05-14 13:06   ` John Johansen
2025-06-11 20:09     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-30 22:03   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-06-11 20:27     ` Paul Moore
2025-06-13 20:34       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-07-21 21:59         ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-04-10 16:33   ` Stephen Smalley
2025-04-11  3:24     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-23 15:12   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:52   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:21     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:16       ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:38   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:53   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:34   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] lsm: add support for counting lsm_prop support among LSMs Paul Moore
2025-05-13 16:39   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-13 20:23     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 19:30       ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 20:57         ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 21:16           ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 22:11             ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 14:12               ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 18:13                 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 19:41                   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 21:02                     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 16:31   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:28   ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox