From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:13:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409185019.238841-39-paul@paul-moore.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:49:53PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> The LSM currently has a lot of code to maintain a list of the
> currently active LSMs in a human readable string, with the only
> user being the "/sys/kernel/security/lsm" code. Let's drop all
> of that code and generate the string on an as-needed basis when
> userspace reads "/sys/kernel/security/lsm".
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 1 -
> security/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--
> security/lsm_init.c | 49 ---------------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 4cd17c9a229f..bc477fb20d02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct lsm_info {
>
>
> /* DO NOT tamper with these variables outside of the LSM framework */
> -extern char *lsm_names;
> extern struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init;
>
> /**
> diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
> index da3ab44c8e57..49bc3578bd23 100644
> --- a/security/inode.c
> +++ b/security/inode.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> #include <linux/magic.h>
>
> +#include "lsm.h"
> +
> static struct vfsmount *mount;
> static int mount_count;
>
> @@ -343,8 +345,29 @@ static struct dentry *lsm_dentry;
> static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
> loff_t *ppos)
> {
> - return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names,
> - strlen(lsm_names));
> + int i;
> + char *str;
> + ssize_t rc, len = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < lsm_count; i++)
> + /* the '+ 1' accounts for either a comma or a NUL terminator */
> + len += strlen(lsm_order[i]->id->name) + 1;
> +
> + str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!str)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + str[0] = '\0';
> +
> + i = 0;
> + while (i < lsm_count) {
> + strcat(str, lsm_order[i]->id->name);
> + if (++i < lsm_count)
> + strcat(str, ",");
> + }
> +
> + rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, str, len);
> + kfree(str);
> + return rc;
Hrm, at least cache it?
static char *lsm_names;
static ssize_t lsm_names_len;
static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
loff_t *ppos)
{
if (!lsm_names) {
int i;
char *str;
ssize_t len = 0;
...
lsm_names = str;
}
return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names, lsm_names_len);
}
Better yet, do this whole thing in a initcall after LSMs are loaded, and
both can gain __ro_after_init...
>
> static const struct file_operations lsm_ops = {
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 981ddb20f48e..978bb81b58fa 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
>
> #include "lsm.h"
>
> -char *lsm_names;
> -
> /* Pointers to LSM sections defined in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h */
> extern struct lsm_info __start_lsm_info[], __end_lsm_info[];
> extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
> @@ -363,42 +361,6 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *lsm)
> -{
> - const char *last;
> -
> - if (WARN_ON(!list || !lsm))
> - return false;
> - last = strrchr(list, ',');
> - if (last)
> - /* Pass the comma, strcmp() will check for '\0' */
> - last++;
> - else
> - last = list;
> - return !strcmp(last, lsm);
> -}
> -
> -static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
> -{
> - char *cp;
> -
> - if (*result == NULL) {
> - *result = kstrdup(new, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (*result == NULL)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - } else {
> - /* Check if it is the last registered name */
> - if (match_last_lsm(*result, new))
> - return 0;
> - cp = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", *result, new);
> - if (cp == NULL)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - kfree(*result);
> - *result = cp;
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static void __init lsm_static_call_init(struct security_hook_list *hl)
> {
> struct lsm_static_call *scall = hl->scalls;
> @@ -435,15 +397,6 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
> lsm_static_call_init(&hooks[i]);
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * Don't try to append during early_security_init(), we'll come back
> - * and fix this up afterwards.
> - */
> - if (slab_is_available()) {
> - if (lsm_append(lsmid->name, &lsm_names) < 0)
> - panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
> - }
> }
>
> int __init early_security_init(void)
> @@ -480,8 +433,6 @@ int __init security_init(void)
> lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
> init_debug(" early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->id->name,
> is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> - if (lsm->enabled)
> - lsm_append(lsm->id->name, &lsm_names);
> }
>
> /* Load LSMs in specified order. */
> --
> 2.49.0
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 18:49 [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 12:14 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:18 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:01 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] lsm: simplify prepare_lsm() and rename to lsm_prep_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 21:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:10 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] lsm: simplify ordered_lsm_init() and rename to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 22:31 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:20 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM order symbols naming Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:00 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:23 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 21:58 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:06 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 22:04 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 22:25 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 0:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:13 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-04-10 22:47 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:15 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 3:14 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:30 ` John Johansen
2025-05-22 21:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM enabled functions Paul Moore
2025-04-10 0:11 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:50 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:03 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:14 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:17 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:02 ` John Johansen
2025-04-19 2:42 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-19 5:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-19 15:58 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:30 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:04 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM ordered parsing Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] lsm: add missing function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-05-14 10:10 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:01 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 20:52 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:59 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:15 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 2:41 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:57 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-14 21:19 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15 1:58 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:02 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:42 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 2:30 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 17:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 17:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-11 20:09 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-14 21:04 ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15 1:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 12:05 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 19:20 ` Micah Morton
2025-04-11 20:45 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:18 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:33 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:31 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/29] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-05-14 13:06 ` John Johansen
2025-06-11 20:09 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-30 22:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-06-11 20:27 ` Paul Moore
2025-06-13 20:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-07-21 21:59 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-04-10 16:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2025-04-11 3:24 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-23 15:12 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:52 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 1:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11 2:16 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:38 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:34 ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] lsm: add support for counting lsm_prop support among LSMs Paul Moore
2025-05-13 16:39 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-13 20:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 19:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 20:57 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 21:16 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 22:11 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 14:12 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 18:13 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 19:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 21:02 ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 16:31 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 2:28 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox