From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A4818052; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 02:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744337765; cv=none; b=YDUARluOtfzvefyxQyYYlzcyzhzdjoaYQ/13nKkZ1YCaF16PITj63xowjHtLYl8X5X7h6K8Z/hOuMaAz4mZFaaUjK0+31tYX9G/erAEvFcPnJuDs6i3Aypk8ryfKW+1ug6cro53ZD9/L1ziyp5fZdix1mur5/c1/txG0u6Z/rdo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744337765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vZvDy+kOrWAaKY3hM8qC9K+FqrF2jjmB07w+WO1ui3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HFxewiRlZ998vRG7vLXSRYWnzF2YpRfQNHGRRSF4l0yVYDFRmH46j649wUMOP8yMUltzx+79ITcpV+tTfVbcgnj9Sw0KdISVQlkRnRpaDOmubXPGWmMI35KgJPggBMr064TrxnEHSgd+/dtV5MK32z0SHh31a2bCp4HKxgugwls= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mjdoRyRC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mjdoRyRC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93E91C4CEE3; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 02:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744337764; bh=vZvDy+kOrWAaKY3hM8qC9K+FqrF2jjmB07w+WO1ui3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mjdoRyRCRvdzLQhbw8W1FCfCoPDZqLOfyfAFWOe0ZnIMwewDB9pkyWnc8sPVUYm9A joQ61cMyrC4aBI6mpLIU95HYE+TPDhyagpQhifpsasc7t5BN9tVvNVbZEUDmzbjBSx utH1WfUjwZCmZinbKoOJCOdxRcaeeFEr2zNHGbvXljg498+mUY9MnY93VITB6XvP8i d/RhdGbXStKBSSpVAb08+b1yWoayYCzcQ4mVZzRcHeAi13bX0DrVcyQBgJXj60l/F2 jOHShV4cGuIUHZ+lYIkWzU2Pw2bULgK9Qhi88pKxOnEYPEy13anrgKKj5dq173+Szy d7nRSgAbUP8KA== Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:16:01 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Paul Moore Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, John Johansen , Mimi Zohar , Roberto Sassu , Fan Wu , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= , =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= Noack , Micah Morton , Casey Schaufler , Tetsuo Handa Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/29] loadpin: move initcalls to the LSM framework Message-ID: <202504101915.CA031AE@keescook> References: <20250409185019.238841-31-paul@paul-moore.com> <20250409185019.238841-49-paul@paul-moore.com> <202504091639.A12E1A853E@keescook> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:15:47PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:39 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:50:03PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore > > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > > Do you mind if I convert this into an Acked-by? Generally speaking I > put more weight behind a Reviewed-by tag, but in the case of Loadpin > you are the maintainer and I'd much prefer an Acked-by. While I'm > always happy to get more reviews on a patch, the primary reason for > CC'ing you directly was to get ACKs on the LSMs you maintain :) Acked-by: Kees Cook :) -- Kees Cook