linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	mattbobrowski@google.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
	daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] kernfs: Add __kernfs_xattr_get for RCU protected access
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:33:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025061917-unrushed-overtake-e4ef@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619-kaulquappen-absagen-27377e154bc0@brauner>

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:37:36PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Existing kernfs_xattr_get() locks iattr_mutex, so it cannot be used in
> > RCU critical sections. Introduce __kernfs_xattr_get(), which reads xattr
> > under RCU read lock. This can be used by BPF programs to access cgroupfs
> > xattrs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/kernfs/inode.c      | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/kernfs.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/inode.c b/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > index b83054da68b3..0ca231d2012c 100644
> > --- a/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/kernfs/inode.c
> > @@ -302,6 +302,20 @@ int kernfs_xattr_get(struct kernfs_node *kn, const char *name,
> >  	return simple_xattr_get(&attrs->xattrs, name, value, size);
> >  }
> >  
> > +int __kernfs_xattr_get(struct kernfs_node *kn, const char *name,
> > +		       void *value, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	struct kernfs_iattrs *attrs;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> > +
> > +	attrs = rcu_dereference(kn->iattr);
> > +	if (!attrs)
> > +		return -ENODATA;
> 
> Hm, that looks a bit silly. Which isn't your fault. I'm looking at the
> kernfs code that does the xattr allocations and I think that's the
> origin of the silliness. It uses a single global mutex for all kernfs
> users thus serializing all allocations for kernfs->iattr. That seems
> crazy but maybe I'm missing a good reason.
> 
> I'm appending a patch to remove that mutex. @Greg, @Tejun, can you take
> a look whether that makes sense to you. Then I can take that patch and
> you can build yours on top of the series and I'll pick it all up in one
> go.

Looks sane to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 23:37 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Song Liu
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] kernfs: Add __kernfs_xattr_get for RCU protected access Song Liu
2025-06-19 10:01   ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-19 10:33     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-06-19 15:33     ` Song Liu
2025-06-21  2:38     ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-19 13:57   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr to read xattr of kernfs nodes Song Liu
2025-06-19  8:49   ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Mark cgroup_subsys_state->cgroup RCU safe Song Liu
2025-06-18 23:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Song Liu
2025-06-19  0:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Introduce bpf_kernfs_read_xattr Tejun Heo
2025-06-19  8:48   ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-19 15:31     ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025061917-unrushed-overtake-e4ef@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).