From: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
ap420073@gmail.com, jv@jvosburgh.net, freude@linux.ibm.com,
bcrl@kvack.org, trondmy@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
kees@kernel.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, hdanton@sina.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/14] wifi: mac80211: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:47:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916044735.2316171-11-dolinux.peng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916044735.2316171-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().
There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().
Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
---
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 2 --
net/mac80211/debugfs.c | 2 --
net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c | 2 --
net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 2 --
net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 --
5 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
index 2ed07fa121ab..4fe50d4c461d 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -4825,7 +4825,6 @@ static int ieee80211_get_txq_stats(struct wiphy *wiphy,
int ret = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
if (wdev) {
sdata = IEEE80211_WDEV_TO_SUB_IF(wdev);
@@ -4851,7 +4850,6 @@ static int ieee80211_get_txq_stats(struct wiphy *wiphy,
}
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
return ret;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
index e8b78ec682da..82099f4cedbe 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static ssize_t aqm_read(struct file *file,
int len = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
len = scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
"access name value\n"
@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static ssize_t aqm_read(struct file *file,
fq->limit,
fq->quantum);
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
return simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos,
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
index 1dac78271045..30a5a978a678 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_fmt_aqm(
txqi = to_txq_info(sdata->vif.txq);
spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
len = scnprintf(buf,
buflen,
@@ -642,7 +641,6 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_fmt_aqm(
txqi->tin.tx_bytes,
txqi->tin.tx_packets);
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
return len;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
index 49061bd4151b..ef75255d47d5 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ static ssize_t sta_aqm_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
p += scnprintf(p,
bufsz + buf - p,
@@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static ssize_t sta_aqm_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_DIRTY, &txqi->flags) ? " DIRTY" : "");
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
rv = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, p - buf);
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
index 8c550aab9bdc..663318a75d7f 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
@@ -2637,13 +2637,11 @@ static void sta_set_tidstats(struct sta_info *sta,
if (link_id < 0 && tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS) {
spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
tidstats->filled |= BIT(NL80211_TID_STATS_TXQ_STATS);
ieee80211_fill_txq_stats(&tidstats->txq_stats,
to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]));
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
}
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 4:47 [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] ACPI: APEI: " pengdonglin
2025-09-27 3:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2025-09-28 10:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/i915/gt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] fs: aio: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] nfs: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] s390/pkey: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 10:51 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] ipc: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] yama: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] cgroup: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] cgroup/cpuset: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` pengdonglin [this message]
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] net: ncsi: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 9:41 ` Paul Fertser
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] net: amt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] net: bonding: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] wifi: ath9k: " pengdonglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916044735.2316171-11-dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--to=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).