From: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
ap420073@gmail.com, jv@jvosburgh.net, freude@linux.ibm.com,
bcrl@kvack.org, trondmy@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
kees@kernel.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, hdanton@sina.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/14] net: amt: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:47:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916044735.2316171-13-dolinux.peng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916044735.2316171-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().
There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().
Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.
Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/amt.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/amt.c b/drivers/net/amt.c
index ed86537b2f61..aaed9fbc7526 100644
--- a/drivers/net/amt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/amt.c
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ static void amt_source_work(struct work_struct *work)
tunnel = gnode->tunnel_list;
spin_lock_bh(&tunnel->lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
if (gnode->filter_mode == MCAST_INCLUDE) {
amt_destroy_source(snode);
if (!gnode->nr_sources)
@@ -306,7 +305,6 @@ static void amt_source_work(struct work_struct *work)
*/
snode->status = AMT_SOURCE_STATUS_D_FWD;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->lock);
}
@@ -426,7 +424,6 @@ static void amt_group_work(struct work_struct *work)
goto out;
}
- rcu_read_lock();
for (i = 0; i < buckets; i++) {
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(snode, t,
&gnode->sources[i], node) {
@@ -443,7 +440,6 @@ static void amt_group_work(struct work_struct *work)
amt_del_group(amt, gnode);
else
gnode->filter_mode = MCAST_INCLUDE;
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->lock);
out:
dev_put(amt->dev);
@@ -1327,11 +1323,9 @@ static void amt_clear_groups(struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel)
int i;
spin_lock_bh(&tunnel->lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
for (i = 0; i < amt->hash_buckets; i++)
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(gnode, t, &tunnel->groups[i], node)
amt_del_group(amt, gnode);
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->lock);
}
@@ -1343,11 +1337,9 @@ static void amt_tunnel_expire(struct work_struct *work)
struct amt_dev *amt = tunnel->amt;
spin_lock_bh(&amt->lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
list_del_rcu(&tunnel->list);
amt->nr_tunnels--;
amt_clear_groups(tunnel);
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_bh(&amt->lock);
kfree_rcu(tunnel, rcu);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 4:47 [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] ACPI: APEI: " pengdonglin
2025-09-27 3:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2025-09-28 10:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/i915/gt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] fs: aio: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] nfs: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] s390/pkey: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 10:51 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] ipc: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] yama: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] cgroup: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] cgroup/cpuset: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] wifi: mac80211: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] net: ncsi: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 9:41 ` Paul Fertser
2025-09-16 4:47 ` pengdonglin [this message]
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] net: bonding: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] wifi: ath9k: " pengdonglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916044735.2316171-13-dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--to=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).