From: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
ap420073@gmail.com, jv@jvosburgh.net, freude@linux.ibm.com,
bcrl@kvack.org, trondmy@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
kees@kernel.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, hdanton@sina.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/14] nfs: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:47:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916044735.2316171-5-dolinux.peng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916044735.2316171-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().
There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().
Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
---
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 2 --
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 --
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 12 +-----------
fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c | 4 ----
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 8397c43358bd..16144db39335 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ __be32 nfs4_callback_offload(void *data, void *dummy,
return cpu_to_be32(NFS4ERR_DELAY);
spin_lock(&cps->clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &cps->clp->cl_superblocks,
client_link) {
list_for_each_entry(tmp_copy, &server->ss_copies, copies) {
@@ -736,7 +735,6 @@ __be32 nfs4_callback_offload(void *data, void *dummy,
}
}
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!found) {
memcpy(©->stateid, &args->coa_stateid, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
nfs4_copy_cb_args(copy, args);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 7612e977e80b..598229fc07ed 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -241,13 +241,11 @@ const struct cred *nfs4_get_renew_cred(struct nfs_client *clp)
goto out;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
cred = nfs4_get_renew_cred_server_locked(server);
if (cred != NULL)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
out:
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index a3135b5af7ee..650f86fa144a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -838,13 +838,12 @@ pnfs_layout_add_bulk_destroy_list(struct inode *inode,
return ret;
}
-/* Caller must hold rcu_read_lock and clp->cl_lock */
+/* Caller must hold clp->cl_lock (implies rcu_read_lock) */
static int
pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(struct nfs_client *clp,
struct nfs_server *server,
struct list_head *layout_list)
__must_hold(&clp->cl_lock)
- __must_hold(RCU)
{
struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, *next;
struct inode *inode;
@@ -862,16 +861,13 @@ pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(struct nfs_client *clp,
if (pnfs_layout_add_bulk_destroy_list(inode,
layout_list))
continue;
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
iput(inode);
} else {
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
}
nfs_sb_deactive(server->super);
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;
@@ -922,7 +918,6 @@ int pnfs_layout_destroy_byfsid(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs_fsid *fsid,
LIST_HEAD(layout_list);
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
restart:
list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
if (memcmp(&server->fsid, fsid, sizeof(*fsid)) != 0)
@@ -932,7 +927,6 @@ int pnfs_layout_destroy_byfsid(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs_fsid *fsid,
&layout_list) != 0)
goto restart;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
return pnfs_layout_free_bulk_destroy_list(&layout_list, mode);
@@ -944,14 +938,12 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_destroy_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
struct nfs_server *server;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
restart:
list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
if (pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(clp, server,
list) != 0)
goto restart;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
}
@@ -990,7 +982,6 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_recover_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
struct nfs_server *server;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
restart:
list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
if (!(server->caps & NFS_CAP_REBOOT_LAYOUTRETURN))
@@ -999,7 +990,6 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_recover_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
list) != 0)
goto restart;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
index bf0f2d67e96c..d19752ec1a95 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
@@ -231,9 +231,7 @@ nfs4_delete_deviceid(const struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld,
struct nfs4_deviceid_node *d;
spin_lock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
d = _lookup_deviceid(ld, clp, id, nfs4_deviceid_hash(id));
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!d) {
spin_unlock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
return;
@@ -331,14 +329,12 @@ _deviceid_purge_client(const struct nfs_client *clp, long hash)
HLIST_HEAD(tmp);
spin_lock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(d, &nfs4_deviceid_cache[hash], node)
if (d->nfs_client == clp && atomic_read(&d->ref)) {
hlist_del_init_rcu(&d->node);
hlist_add_head(&d->tmpnode, &tmp);
clear_bit(NFS_DEVICEID_NOCACHE, &d->flags);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
if (hlist_empty(&tmp))
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 4:47 [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] ACPI: APEI: " pengdonglin
2025-09-27 3:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2025-09-28 10:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/i915/gt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] fs: aio: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` pengdonglin [this message]
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] s390/pkey: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 10:51 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] ipc: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] yama: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] cgroup: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] cgroup/cpuset: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] wifi: mac80211: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] net: ncsi: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 9:41 ` Paul Fertser
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] net: amt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] net: bonding: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 4:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] wifi: ath9k: " pengdonglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916044735.2316171-5-dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--to=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).