linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	ap420073@gmail.com, jv@jvosburgh.net, freude@linux.ibm.com,
	bcrl@kvack.org, trondmy@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
	kees@kernel.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, hdanton@sina.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/14] nfs: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:47:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916044735.2316171-5-dolinux.peng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916044735.2316171-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com>

From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>

Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().

There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().

Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.

Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
---
 fs/nfs/callback_proc.c |  2 --
 fs/nfs/nfs4state.c     |  2 --
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c          | 12 +-----------
 fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c      |  4 ----
 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 8397c43358bd..16144db39335 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ __be32 nfs4_callback_offload(void *data, void *dummy,
 		return cpu_to_be32(NFS4ERR_DELAY);
 
 	spin_lock(&cps->clp->cl_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &cps->clp->cl_superblocks,
 				client_link) {
 		list_for_each_entry(tmp_copy, &server->ss_copies, copies) {
@@ -736,7 +735,6 @@ __be32 nfs4_callback_offload(void *data, void *dummy,
 		}
 	}
 out:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (!found) {
 		memcpy(&copy->stateid, &args->coa_stateid, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE);
 		nfs4_copy_cb_args(copy, args);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 7612e977e80b..598229fc07ed 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -241,13 +241,11 @@ const struct cred *nfs4_get_renew_cred(struct nfs_client *clp)
 		goto out;
 
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
 		cred = nfs4_get_renew_cred_server_locked(server);
 		if (cred != NULL)
 			break;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 
 out:
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index a3135b5af7ee..650f86fa144a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -838,13 +838,12 @@ pnfs_layout_add_bulk_destroy_list(struct inode *inode,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold rcu_read_lock and clp->cl_lock */
+/* Caller must hold clp->cl_lock (implies rcu_read_lock) */
 static int
 pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(struct nfs_client *clp,
 		struct nfs_server *server,
 		struct list_head *layout_list)
 	__must_hold(&clp->cl_lock)
-	__must_hold(RCU)
 {
 	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, *next;
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -862,16 +861,13 @@ pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(struct nfs_client *clp,
 			if (pnfs_layout_add_bulk_destroy_list(inode,
 						layout_list))
 				continue;
-			rcu_read_unlock();
 			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 			iput(inode);
 		} else {
-			rcu_read_unlock();
 			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 		}
 		nfs_sb_deactive(server->super);
 		spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-		rcu_read_lock();
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -922,7 +918,6 @@ int pnfs_layout_destroy_byfsid(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs_fsid *fsid,
 	LIST_HEAD(layout_list);
 
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 restart:
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
 		if (memcmp(&server->fsid, fsid, sizeof(*fsid)) != 0)
@@ -932,7 +927,6 @@ int pnfs_layout_destroy_byfsid(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs_fsid *fsid,
 				&layout_list) != 0)
 			goto restart;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 
 	return pnfs_layout_free_bulk_destroy_list(&layout_list, mode);
@@ -944,14 +938,12 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_destroy_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
 	struct nfs_server *server;
 
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 restart:
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
 		if (pnfs_layout_bulk_destroy_byserver_locked(clp, server,
 							     list) != 0)
 			goto restart;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 }
 
@@ -990,7 +982,6 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_recover_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
 	struct nfs_server *server;
 
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 restart:
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &clp->cl_superblocks, client_link) {
 		if (!(server->caps & NFS_CAP_REBOOT_LAYOUTRETURN))
@@ -999,7 +990,6 @@ static void pnfs_layout_build_recover_list_byclient(struct nfs_client *clp,
 							     list) != 0)
 			goto restart;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
index bf0f2d67e96c..d19752ec1a95 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
@@ -231,9 +231,7 @@ nfs4_delete_deviceid(const struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld,
 	struct nfs4_deviceid_node *d;
 
 	spin_lock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	d = _lookup_deviceid(ld, clp, id, nfs4_deviceid_hash(id));
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (!d) {
 		spin_unlock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
 		return;
@@ -331,14 +329,12 @@ _deviceid_purge_client(const struct nfs_client *clp, long hash)
 	HLIST_HEAD(tmp);
 
 	spin_lock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(d, &nfs4_deviceid_cache[hash], node)
 		if (d->nfs_client == clp && atomic_read(&d->ref)) {
 			hlist_del_init_rcu(&d->node);
 			hlist_add_head(&d->tmpnode, &tmp);
 			clear_bit(NFS_DEVICEID_NOCACHE, &d->flags);
 		}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
 
 	if (hlist_empty(&tmp))
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16  4:47 [PATCH v3 00/14] Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] ACPI: APEI: " pengdonglin
2025-09-27  3:22   ` Hanjun Guo
2025-09-28 10:33     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/i915/gt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] fs: aio: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` pengdonglin [this message]
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] s390/pkey: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 10:51   ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] ipc: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] yama: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] cgroup: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37   ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] cgroup/cpuset: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16 18:37   ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] wifi: mac80211: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] net: ncsi: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  9:41   ` Paul Fertser
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] net: amt: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] net: bonding: " pengdonglin
2025-09-16  4:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] wifi: ath9k: " pengdonglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250916044735.2316171-5-dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
    --to=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pengdonglin@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).