From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 19/35] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:59:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918140451.1289454-20-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918140451.1289454-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for local_lock_t and
local_trylock_t.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Switch to DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS() (suggested by Peter)
* __assert -> __assume rename
* Rework __this_cpu_local_lock helper
* Support local_trylock_t
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/local_lock.h | 45 +++++++-----
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 71 ++++++++++++++----
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 7a4c2238c910..9fb964e94920 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index 2ba846419524..cfdca5bee89e 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@
* local_lock - Acquire a per CPU local lock
* @lock: The lock variable
*/
-#define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+#define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock))
/**
* local_lock_irq - Acquire a per CPU local lock and disable interrupts
* @lock: The lock variable
*/
-#define local_lock_irq(lock) __local_lock_irq(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+#define local_lock_irq(lock) __local_lock_irq(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock))
/**
* local_lock_irqsave - Acquire a per CPU local lock, save and disable
@@ -28,19 +28,19 @@
* @flags: Storage for interrupt flags
*/
#define local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- __local_lock_irqsave(this_cpu_ptr(lock), flags)
+ __local_lock_irqsave(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock), flags)
/**
* local_unlock - Release a per CPU local lock
* @lock: The lock variable
*/
-#define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+#define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock))
/**
* local_unlock_irq - Release a per CPU local lock and enable interrupts
* @lock: The lock variable
*/
-#define local_unlock_irq(lock) __local_unlock_irq(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+#define local_unlock_irq(lock) __local_unlock_irq(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock))
/**
* local_unlock_irqrestore - Release a per CPU local lock and restore
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
* @flags: Interrupt flags to restore
*/
#define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
- __local_unlock_irqrestore(this_cpu_ptr(lock), flags)
+ __local_unlock_irqrestore(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock), flags)
/**
* local_lock_init - Runtime initialize a lock instance
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
* locking constrains it will _always_ fail to acquire the lock in NMI or
* HARDIRQ context on PREEMPT_RT.
*/
-#define local_trylock(lock) __local_trylock(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+#define local_trylock(lock) __local_trylock(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock))
/**
* local_trylock_irqsave - Try to acquire a per CPU local lock, save and disable
@@ -77,27 +77,32 @@
* HARDIRQ context on PREEMPT_RT.
*/
#define local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- __local_trylock_irqsave(this_cpu_ptr(lock), flags)
-
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock(_T),
- local_unlock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock_irq(_T),
- local_unlock_irq(_T))
+ __local_trylock_irqsave(__this_cpu_local_lock(lock), flags)
+
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
local_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
unsigned long flags)
#define local_lock_nested_bh(_lock) \
- __local_lock_nested_bh(this_cpu_ptr(_lock))
+ __local_lock_nested_bh(__this_cpu_local_lock(_lock))
#define local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock) \
- __local_unlock_nested_bh(this_cpu_ptr(_lock))
+ __local_unlock_nested_bh(__this_cpu_local_lock(_lock))
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu*,
- local_lock_nested_bh(_T),
- local_unlock_nested_bh(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu,
+ local_lock_nested_bh(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(_T->lock))
+
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(local_lock, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(local_lock_irq, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(local_lock_irqsave, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
+DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_1_ATTRS(local_lock_nested_bh, __assumes_cap(_T), /* */)
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 4c0e117d2d08..22ffaf06d9eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -10,18 +10,20 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
-typedef struct {
+struct_with_capability(local_lock) {
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
struct task_struct *owner;
#endif
-} local_lock_t;
+};
+typedef struct local_lock local_lock_t;
/* local_trylock() and local_trylock_irqsave() only work with local_trylock_t */
-typedef struct {
+struct_with_capability(local_trylock) {
local_lock_t llock;
u8 acquired;
-} local_trylock_t;
+};
+typedef struct local_trylock local_trylock_t;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) \
@@ -81,9 +83,14 @@ do { \
0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
LD_LOCK_PERCPU); \
local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
+ __assume_cap(lock); \
} while (0)
-#define __local_trylock_init(lock) __local_lock_init(lock.llock)
+#define __local_trylock_init(lock) \
+do { \
+ __local_lock_init(lock.llock); \
+ __assume_cap(lock); \
+} while (0)
#define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock) \
do { \
@@ -94,6 +101,7 @@ do { \
0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
LD_LOCK_NORMAL); \
local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
+ __assume_cap(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_acquire(lock) \
@@ -116,22 +124,25 @@ do { \
do { \
preempt_disable(); \
__local_lock_acquire(lock); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irq(lock) \
do { \
local_irq_disable(); \
__local_lock_acquire(lock); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
do { \
local_irq_save(flags); \
__local_lock_acquire(lock); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_trylock(lock) \
- ({ \
+ __try_acquire_cap(lock, ({ \
local_trylock_t *tl; \
\
preempt_disable(); \
@@ -145,10 +156,10 @@ do { \
(local_lock_t *)tl); \
} \
!!tl; \
- })
+ }))
#define __local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- ({ \
+ __try_acquire_cap(lock, ({ \
local_trylock_t *tl; \
\
local_irq_save(flags); \
@@ -162,7 +173,7 @@ do { \
(local_lock_t *)tl); \
} \
!!tl; \
- })
+ }))
#define __local_lock_release(lock) \
do { \
@@ -182,18 +193,21 @@ do { \
#define __local_unlock(lock) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
__local_lock_release(lock); \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irq(lock) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
__local_lock_release(lock); \
local_irq_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
do { \
+ __release(lock); \
__local_lock_release(lock); \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
@@ -202,13 +216,19 @@ do { \
do { \
lockdep_assert_in_softirq(); \
local_lock_acquire((lock)); \
+ __acquire(lock); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock) \
- local_lock_release((lock))
+ do { \
+ __release(lock); \
+ local_lock_release((lock)); \
+ } while (0)
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
/*
* On PREEMPT_RT local_lock maps to a per CPU spinlock, which protects the
* critical section while staying preemptible.
@@ -263,7 +283,7 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#define __local_trylock(lock) \
- ({ \
+ __try_acquire_cap(lock, capability_unsafe(({ \
int __locked; \
\
if (in_nmi() | in_hardirq()) { \
@@ -275,13 +295,36 @@ do { \
migrate_enable(); \
} \
__locked; \
- })
+ })))
#define __local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- ({ \
+ __try_acquire_cap(lock, ({ \
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
flags = 0; \
__local_trylock(lock); \
- })
+ }))
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
+#if defined(WARN_CAPABILITY_ANALYSIS)
+/*
+ * Because the compiler only knows about the base per-CPU variable, use this
+ * helper function to make the compiler think we lock/unlock the @base variable,
+ * and hide the fact we actually pass the per-CPU instance to lock/unlock
+ * functions.
+ */
+static __always_inline local_lock_t *__this_cpu_local_lock(local_lock_t __percpu *base)
+ __returns_cap(base) __attribute__((overloadable))
+{
+ return this_cpu_ptr(base);
+}
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+static __always_inline local_trylock_t *__this_cpu_local_lock(local_trylock_t __percpu *base)
+ __returns_cap(base) __attribute__((overloadable))
+{
+ return this_cpu_ptr(base);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
+#else /* WARN_CAPABILITY_ANALYSIS */
+#define __this_cpu_local_lock(base) this_cpu_ptr(base)
+#endif /* WARN_CAPABILITY_ANALYSIS */
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 3c6dad0ba065..e506dadb3933 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@
#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
+#include <linux/local_lock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
@@ -450,3 +452,74 @@ static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
}
+
+struct test_local_lock_data {
+ local_lock_t lock;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&lock);
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct test_local_lock_data, test_local_lock_data) = {
+ .lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+};
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_init(struct test_local_lock_data *d)
+{
+ local_lock_init(&d->lock);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock(void)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_lock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+ local_lock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+ local_lock_irqsave(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
+{
+ { guard(local_lock)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_irq)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+ { guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+}
+
+struct test_local_trylock_data {
+ local_trylock_t lock;
+ int counter __guarded_by(&lock);
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct test_local_trylock_data, test_local_trylock_data) = {
+ .lock = INIT_LOCAL_TRYLOCK(lock),
+};
+
+static void __used test_local_trylock_init(struct test_local_trylock_data *d)
+{
+ local_trylock_init(&d->lock);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_trylock(void)
+{
+ local_lock(&test_local_trylock_data.lock);
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_trylock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock(&test_local_trylock_data.lock);
+
+ if (local_trylock(&test_local_trylock_data.lock)) {
+ this_cpu_add(test_local_trylock_data.counter, 1);
+ local_unlock(&test_local_trylock_data.lock);
+ }
+}
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 13:59 [PATCH v3 00/35] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/35] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:58 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-18 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/35] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/35] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-09-18 20:36 ` Joe Perches
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/35] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/35] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/35] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/35] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/35] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/35] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/35] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/35] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/35] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/35] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/35] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/35] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/35] locking/ww_mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/35] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/35] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/35] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/35] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/35] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/35] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/35] kcsan: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 30/35] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 31/35] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 32/35] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 33/35] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 34/35] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-09-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 35/35] sched: Enable capability analysis for core.c and fair.c Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/35] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-18 17:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-18 19:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-22 9:33 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-22 17:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 19:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-19 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-22 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-20 10:23 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-20 12:44 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-18 21:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-09-19 9:10 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-13 14:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-11-14 4:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14 13:22 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-18 16:21 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-18 19:41 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-09-19 7:05 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918140451.1289454-20-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).