From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single()
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:24:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251017202456.484010-53-paul@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017202456.484010-36-paul@paul-moore.com>
Rename initialize_lsm() to be more consistent with the rest of the LSM
initialization changes and rework the function itself to better fit
with the "exit on fail" coding pattern.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/lsm_init.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
index 6b1f8f18a43c..eb473f982ddb 100644
--- a/security/lsm_init.c
+++ b/security/lsm_init.c
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static void __init lsm_order_append(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *src)
lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
}
+
/**
* lsm_blob_size_update - Update the LSM blob size and offset information
* @sz_req: the requested additional blob size
@@ -225,16 +226,20 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
lsm_blob_size_update(&blobs->lbs_bpf_token, &blob_sizes.lbs_bpf_token);
}
-/* Initialize a given LSM, if it is enabled. */
-static void __init initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
+/**
+ * lsm_init_single - Initialize a given LSM
+ * @lsm: LSM definition
+ */
+static void __init lsm_init_single(struct lsm_info *lsm)
{
- if (lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
- int ret;
+ int ret;
- init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->id->name);
- ret = lsm->init();
- WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->id->name, ret);
- }
+ if (!lsm_is_enabled(lsm))
+ return;
+
+ init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->id->name);
+ ret = lsm->init();
+ WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->id->name, ret);
}
/**
@@ -379,7 +384,7 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
panic("%s: early task alloc failed.\n", __func__);
lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
- initialize_lsm(*lsm);
+ lsm_init_single(*lsm);
}
}
@@ -429,7 +434,7 @@ int __init early_security_init(void)
lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
lsm_order_append(lsm, "early");
lsm_prepare(lsm);
- initialize_lsm(lsm);
+ lsm_init_single(lsm);
}
return 0;
--
2.51.1.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 20:24 [PATCH v5 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] loadpin: move initcalls to the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-10-17 20:59 ` [PATCH v5 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-10-22 23:34 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251017202456.484010-53-paul@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).