From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-bc0e.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-bc0e.mail.infomaniak.ch [45.157.188.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4981E492A for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.157.188.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760992651; cv=none; b=cYlgG/dkIBfwZ1OgBtseNwxZB514ktR8XvZu20O60L7BzvfIfPaixr27OCyhQ9McP/6NRlyYPG+CrSlX7xikE8fJcf3RwlhMyL6Zrx8qJr6DrFy689aQS8wSGKYQ+4ysdvuJxszbW5SfF1n79PAci4tGOuT2zUj0GdtOWKAYQhs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760992651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+WKmm8u4jlzwsKZN/go5dqD4dMHoNS59XrqqGfdzpwM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uwNOB/8WPU2mbfuf6KwJO5Oburmlyb0ahbcjom0PxxMCFR4oCStt3pB09TbsjH33Spl6imP+G2eg74ras+8UnW1QU4cH3wdG+6Ttq97rarOIOYVTDByfbDSmBqe3snGzLbg4iNMUJnZDzV8ylpjbJkeLwN2PdrTyZYHRn9Qmsac= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=H0LsgaY/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.157.188.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="H0LsgaY/" Received: from smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.4.36.108]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cr66N3tgxzZbk; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:12:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1760991148; bh=Pugd6RzrkL/V2H4BAg5r+nT4TY+kGAvOxY6UahNsWwg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H0LsgaY/+9YKSkI1eNYbnz1nuJyqkRtdu9R1iXQq8UFi/2RcAEcetgN24zxFMd4od l+GXDWbQwt0Q8ojBmUpjbHLEE77HzxRZrtTtI+mXewi2VVNiO9T8nRSGyF5dzViZe+ BHB0mU4/T5AFlN8vx0OVeXOW7BcLlDOva2tFlXcs= Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4cr66N0RG9zRMg; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:12:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:12:27 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Tingmao Wang Cc: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack , Jan Kara , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] landlock/audit: Check for quiet flag in landlock_log_denial Message-ID: <20251020.que5Chod1ooC@digikod.net> References: <730434d416100f6a72b12fb31eb7253bc8b6fcc0.1759686613.git.m@maowtm.org> <20251015.Iengoh1eeT0c@digikod.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 06:39:55PM +0100, Tingmao Wang wrote: > On 10/15/25 20:09, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > Just use "landlock: " as subject prefix. > > What about samples/landlock or selftests/landlock (in the next version)? > Should they also just be landlock: ? No, those are good. The idea is that these three prefixes identify Landlock-related code (and potential different/complementary maintainers) in different places. It's not useful to identify part of Landlock inside one file hierarchy. In doubt, just follow the same pattern as in previous commits: - samples/landlock: Files in samples/landlock/ - selftests/landlock: Files in tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ - landlock: Files in security/landlock/, Documentation/*/landlock.rst, and Landlock catchall.