From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Demi Marie Obenour" <demiobenour@gmail.com>,
"Alyssa Ross" <hi@alyssa.is>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Tahera Fahimi" <fahimitahera@gmail.com>,
"Justin Suess" <utilityemal77@gmail.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] landlock: Implement LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 22:27:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129.iCah3fash9ch@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6d6479888d9d216a3f2e7bb133523f856f92461.1767115163.git.m@maowtm.org>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 05:20:20PM +0000, Tingmao Wang wrote:
> Extend the existing abstract UNIX socket scoping to pathname sockets as
> well. Basically all of the logic is reused between the two types, just
> that pathname sockets scoping are controlled by another bit, and has its
> own audit request type (since the current one is named
> "abstract_unix_socket").
>
> Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/51
> Signed-off-by: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Factor out common code in hook_unix_stream_connect and
> hook_unix_may_send into check_socket_access(), and inline
> is_abstract_socket().
>
> security/landlock/audit.c | 4 ++
> security/landlock/audit.h | 1 +
> security/landlock/task.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
> index e899995f1fd5..0626cc553ab0 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ get_blocker(const enum landlock_request_type type,
> WARN_ON_ONCE(access_bit != -1);
> return "scope.abstract_unix_socket";
>
> + case LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(access_bit != -1);
> + return "scope.pathname_unix_socket";
> +
> case LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_SIGNAL:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(access_bit != -1);
> return "scope.signal";
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.h b/security/landlock/audit.h
> index 92428b7fc4d8..1c9ce8588102 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ enum landlock_request_type {
> LANDLOCK_REQUEST_NET_ACCESS,
> LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET,
> LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_SIGNAL,
> + LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET,
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/security/landlock/task.c b/security/landlock/task.c
> index 833bc0cfe5c9..10dc356baf6f 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/task.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/task.c
> @@ -232,35 +232,81 @@ static bool domain_is_scoped(const struct landlock_ruleset *const client,
> return false;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * sock_is_scoped - Check if socket connect or send should be restricted
> + * based on scope controls.
> + *
> + * @other: The server socket.
> + * @domain: The client domain.
> + * @scope: The relevant scope bit to check (i.e. pathname or abstract).
> + *
> + * Returns: True if connect should be restricted, false otherwise.
> + */
> static bool sock_is_scoped(struct sock *const other,
> - const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
> + const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> + access_mask_t scope)
> {
> const struct landlock_ruleset *dom_other;
>
> /* The credentials will not change. */
> lockdep_assert_held(&unix_sk(other)->lock);
> dom_other = landlock_cred(other->sk_socket->file->f_cred)->domain;
> - return domain_is_scoped(domain, dom_other,
> - LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET);
> + return domain_is_scoped(domain, dom_other, scope);
> }
>
> -static bool is_abstract_socket(struct sock *const sock)
> +/* Allow us to quickly test if the current domain scopes any form of socket */
Missing final dot.
> +static const struct access_masks unix_scope = {
> + .scope = LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET |
> + LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * UNIX sockets can have three types of addresses: pathname (a filesystem path),
> + * unnamed (not bound to an address), and abstract (sun_path[0] is '\0').
> + * Unnamed sockets include those created with socketpair() and unbound sockets.
> + * We do not restrict unnamed sockets since they have no address to identify.
Not because they have no address but because they cannot be used to
reach a new peer, right?
> + */
> +static int
> +check_socket_access(struct sock *const other,
> + const struct landlock_cred_security *const subject,
> + const size_t handle_layer)
> {
> - struct unix_address *addr = unix_sk(sock)->addr;
> + const struct unix_address *addr = unix_sk(other)->addr;
> + access_mask_t scope;
> + enum landlock_request_type request_type;
>
> + /* Unnamed sockets are not restricted. */
> if (!addr)
> - return false;
> + return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Abstract and pathname Unix sockets have separate scope and audit
UNIX
> + * request type.
> + */
> if (addr->len >= offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + 1 &&
> - addr->name->sun_path[0] == '\0')
> - return true;
> + addr->name->sun_path[0] == '\0') {
> + scope = LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET;
> + request_type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET;
> + } else {
> + scope = LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET;
> + request_type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET;
> + }
>
> - return false;
> -}
> + if (!sock_is_scoped(other, subject->domain, scope))
> + return 0;
>
> -static const struct access_masks unix_scope = {
> - .scope = LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET,
> -};
> + landlock_log_denial(subject, &(struct landlock_request) {
> + .type = request_type,
> + .audit = {
> + .type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NET,
> + .u.net = &(struct lsm_network_audit) {
> + .sk = other,
> + },
> + },
> + .layer_plus_one = handle_layer + 1,
> + });
> + return -EPERM;
> +}
>
> static int hook_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *const sock,
> struct sock *const other,
> @@ -275,23 +321,7 @@ static int hook_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *const sock,
> if (!subject)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!is_abstract_socket(other))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!sock_is_scoped(other, subject->domain))
> - return 0;
> -
> - landlock_log_denial(subject, &(struct landlock_request) {
> - .type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET,
> - .audit = {
> - .type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NET,
> - .u.net = &(struct lsm_network_audit) {
> - .sk = other,
> - },
> - },
> - .layer_plus_one = handle_layer + 1,
> - });
> - return -EPERM;
> + return check_socket_access(other, subject, handle_layer);
> }
>
> static int hook_unix_may_send(struct socket *const sock,
> @@ -302,6 +332,7 @@ static int hook_unix_may_send(struct socket *const sock,
> landlock_get_applicable_subject(current_cred(), unix_scope,
> &handle_layer);
>
> + /* Quick return for non-landlocked tasks. */
> if (!subject)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -312,23 +343,7 @@ static int hook_unix_may_send(struct socket *const sock,
> if (unix_peer(sock->sk) == other->sk)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!is_abstract_socket(other->sk))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!sock_is_scoped(other->sk, subject->domain))
> - return 0;
> -
> - landlock_log_denial(subject, &(struct landlock_request) {
> - .type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET,
> - .audit = {
> - .type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NET,
> - .u.net = &(struct lsm_network_audit) {
> - .sk = other->sk,
> - },
> - },
> - .layer_plus_one = handle_layer + 1,
> - });
> - return -EPERM;
> + return check_socket_access(other->sk, subject, handle_layer);
> }
>
> static const struct access_masks signal_scope = {
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 17:20 [PATCH v2 0/6] Landlock: Implement scope control for pathname Unix sockets Tingmao Wang
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] landlock: Add LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET scope bit to uAPI Tingmao Wang
2026-01-29 21:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] landlock: Implement LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET Tingmao Wang
2026-01-29 21:27 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] samples/landlock: Support LANDLOCK_SCOPE_PATHNAME_UNIX_SOCKET Tingmao Wang
2026-01-29 21:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-01-31 17:48 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-02 20:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests/landlock: Support pathname socket path in set_unix_address Tingmao Wang
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests/landlock: Repurpose scoped_abstract_unix_test.c for pathname sockets too Tingmao Wang
2026-01-29 21:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-02 0:06 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-12-30 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests/landlock: Add pathname socket variants for more tests Tingmao Wang
2026-01-29 21:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-12-30 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Landlock: Implement scope control for pathname Unix sockets Günther Noack
2025-12-31 16:54 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-01-09 12:01 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-01-31 17:41 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-02 20:32 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-02 22:03 ` Justin Suess
2026-02-03 1:26 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-03 17:54 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-03 21:53 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-04 11:44 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-04 16:36 ` Justin Suess
2026-02-04 18:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-05 15:22 ` Justin Suess
[not found] ` <44d216aa-9680-4cf5-bbf0-173869111212@gmail.com>
2026-02-05 19:15 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-08 2:57 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-08 13:44 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-08 13:49 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-04 17:43 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-05 8:02 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-05 10:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-08 2:57 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-08 20:37 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-08 20:48 ` Tingmao Wang
2026-02-08 23:21 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-09 20:20 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-04 17:39 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129.iCah3fash9ch@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=fahimitahera@gmail.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=hi@alyssa.is \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox