From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>,
Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>,
Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com>,
Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>,
Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] landlock: transpose the layer masks data structure
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:28:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129.oozohZah1Uth@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260125195853.109967-4-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 08:58:53PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> The layer masks data structure tracks the requested but unfulfilled
> access rights during an operation's security check. It stores one bit
> for each combination of access right and layer index. If the bit is
> set, that access right is not granted (yet) in the given layer and we
> have to traverse the path further upwards to grant it.
>
> Previously, the layer masks were stored as arrays mapping from access
> right indices to layer_mask_t. The layer_mask_t value then indicates
> all layers in which the given access right is still (tentatively)
> denied.
>
> This patch introduces struct layer_access_masks instead: This struct
> contains an array with the access_mask_t of each (tentatively) denied
> access right in that layer.
>
> The hypothesis of this patch is that this simplifies the code enough
> so that the resulting code will run faster:
>
> * We can use bitwise operations in multiple places where we previously
> looped over bits individually with macros. (Should require less
> branch speculation and lends itself to better loop unrolling.)
>
> * Code is ~75 lines smaller.
>
> Other noteworthy changes:
>
> * In no_more_access(), call a new helper function may_refer(), which
> only solves the asymmetric case. Previously, the code interleaved
> the checks for the two symmetric cases in RENAME_EXCHANGE. It feels
> that the code is clearer when renames without RENAME_EXCHANGE are
> more obviously the normal case.
>
> Tradeoffs:
>
> This change improves performance, at a slight size increase to the
> layer masks data structure.
>
> At the moment, for the filesystem access rights, the data structure
> has the same size as before, but once we introduce the 17th filesystem
> access right, it will double in size (from 32 to 64 bytes), as
> access_mask_t grows from 16 to 32 bit. See the link below for
> measurements.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260120.haeCh4li9Vae@digikod.net/
When adding extra links, please add a [1] reference at the end and use
this reference in the commit message.
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> ---
> security/landlock/access.h | 10 +-
> security/landlock/audit.c | 84 +++------
> security/landlock/audit.h | 3 +-
> security/landlock/domain.c | 45 +++--
> security/landlock/domain.h | 4 +-
> security/landlock/fs.c | 352 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> security/landlock/net.c | 11 +-
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 88 ++++-----
> security/landlock/ruleset.h | 21 ++-
> 9 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 344 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-25 19:58 [PATCH v2 0/3] landlock: Refactor layer masks Günther Noack
2026-01-25 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/landlock: Add filesystem access benchmark Günther Noack
2026-01-28 21:31 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-06 12:24 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-06 12:59 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-06 15:05 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-25 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] landlock: access_mask_subset() helper Günther Noack
2026-01-25 21:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-26 16:48 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-28 21:31 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-01-28 21:38 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-25 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] landlock: transpose the layer masks data structure Günther Noack
2026-01-25 22:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-26 16:52 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-26 17:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-28 21:34 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-01-29 7:56 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-29 16:54 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-06 8:02 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-29 20:28 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-02-01 12:24 ` Günther Noack
2026-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] landlock: Refactor layer masks Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-06 7:32 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-06 7:49 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-06 11:24 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129.oozohZah1Uth@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox