From: wufan@kernel.org
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
corbet@lwn.net, mic@digikod.net, miklos@szeredi.hu,
amir73il@gmail.com, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
Fan Wu <wufan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ipe: document AT_EXECVE_CHECK TOCTOU issue on OverlayFS
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:14:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130001418.18414-1-wufan@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Fan Wu <wufan@kernel.org>
Document a known TOCTOU (time-of-check to time-of-use) issue when using
AT_EXECVE_CHECK with read() on OverlayFS. The deny_write_access()
protection is only held during the syscall, allowing a copy-up operation
to be triggered afterward, causing subsequent read() calls to return
content from the unprotected upper layer.
This is generally not a concern for typical IPE deployments since
dm-verity and fs-verity protected files are effectively read-only.
However, OverlayFS with a writable upper layer presents a special case.
Document mitigation strategies including mounting overlay as read-only
and using mmap() instead of read(). Note that the mmap() mitigation
relies on current OverlayFS implementation details and should not be
considered a security guarantee.
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/ipe.rst | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/ipe.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/ipe.rst
index a756d8158531..b621a98fe5e2 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/ipe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/ipe.rst
@@ -110,6 +110,34 @@ intercepts during the execution process, this mechanism needs the interpreter
to take the initiative, and existing interpreters won't be automatically
supported unless the signal call is added.
+.. WARNING::
+
+ There is a known TOCTOU (time-of-check to time-of-use) issue with
+ ``AT_EXECVE_CHECK`` when interpreters use ``read()`` to obtain script
+ contents after the check [#atacexecvecheck_toctou]_. The ``AT_EXECVE_CHECK``
+ protection (via ``deny_write_access()``) is only held during the syscall.
+ After it returns, the file can be modified before the interpreter reads it.
+
+ In typical IPE deployments, this is not a concern because files protected
+ by dm-verity or fs-verity are effectively read-only and cannot be modified.
+ However, OverlayFS presents a special case: when the lower layer is
+ dm-verity protected (read-only) but the upper layer is writable, an
+ attacker with write access can trigger a copy-up operation after the
+ ``AT_EXECVE_CHECK`` returns, causing subsequent ``read()`` calls to return
+ content from the unprotected upper layer instead of the verified lower layer.
+
+ To mitigate this issue on OverlayFS:
+
+ - Mount the overlay as read-only, or restrict write access to the upper
+ layer.
+ - Interpreters may use ``mmap()`` instead of ``read()`` to obtain script
+ contents. Currently, OverlayFS fixes the underlying real file reference
+ at ``open()`` time for mmap operations, so mmap will continue to access
+ the original lower layer file even after a copy-up. However, this
+ behavior is an implementation detail of OverlayFS and is not guaranteed
+ to remain stable across kernel versions. Do not rely on this as a
+ security guarantee.
+
Threat Model
------------
@@ -833,3 +861,7 @@ A:
kernel's fsverity support; IPE does not impose any
restrictions on the digest algorithm itself;
thus, this list may be out of date.
+
+.. [#atacexecvecheck_toctou] See the O_DENY_WRITE RFC discussion for details on
+ this TOCTOU issue:
+ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822170800.2116980-1-mic@digikod.net/
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-30 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-30 0:14 wufan [this message]
2026-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH] ipe: document AT_EXECVE_CHECK TOCTOU issue on OverlayFS Amir Goldstein
2026-01-30 19:21 ` Fan Wu
2026-01-31 10:22 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260130001418.18414-1-wufan@kernel.org \
--to=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox