From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Serge Hallyn <sergeh@kernel.org>,
Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] landlock: selftests for LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 19:54:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205.yooDuch4phae@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251127115136.3064948-3-gnoack@google.com>
These tests are useful but there are two missing parts:
- testing the restriction of each thread;
- testing the domain ID of each thread.
I'll merge this whole series but could you please extend this test file
with a new patch?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 12:51:35PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> Exercise various scenarios where Landlock domains are enforced across
> all of a processes' threads.
>
> Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 6 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> index f4b1a275d8d9..0fea236ef4bd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd)
> EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno);
> }
>
> -TEST(restrict_self_fd_flags)
> +TEST(restrict_self_fd_logging_flags)
> {
> int fd;
>
> @@ -304,9 +304,9 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd_flags)
> EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno);
> }
>
> -TEST(restrict_self_flags)
> +TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags)
> {
> - const __u32 last_flag = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF;
> + const __u32 last_flag = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
>
> /* Tests invalid flag combinations. */
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3971e0f02c49
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Landlock tests - Enforcing the same restrictions across multiple threads
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2025 Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include <linux/landlock.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +
> +/* create_ruleset - Create a simple ruleset FD common to all tests */
> +static int create_ruleset(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata)
> +{
> + struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> + .handled_access_fs = (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE |
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE),
> + };
> + const int ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> +
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd)
> + {
> + TH_LOG("landlock_create_ruleset: %s", strerror(errno));
> + }
> + return ruleset_fd;
> +}
> +
> +TEST(single_threaded_success)
> +{
> + const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata);
> +
> + disable_caps(_metadata);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd,
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> +void store_no_new_privs(void *data)
I fixed the helpers to make them static.
> +{
> + bool *nnp = data;
> +
> + if (!nnp)
> + return;
> + *nnp = prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void *idle(void *data)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push(store_no_new_privs, data);
> +
> + while (true)
> + sleep(1);
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop(1);
> +}
> +
> +TEST(multi_threaded_success)
> +{
> + pthread_t t1, t2;
> + bool no_new_privs1, no_new_privs2;
> + const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata);
> +
> + disable_caps(_metadata);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t1, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t2, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs2));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd,
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t2));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t1, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t2, NULL));
> +
> + /* The no_new_privs flag was implicitly enabled on all threads. */
> + EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs1);
> + EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs2);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> +TEST(multi_threaded_success_despite_diverging_domains)
> +{
> + pthread_t t1, t2;
> + const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata);
> +
> + disable_caps(_metadata);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t1, NULL, idle, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t2, NULL, idle, NULL));
> +
> + /*
> + * The main thread enforces a ruleset,
> + * thereby bringing the threads' Landlock domains out of sync.
> + */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, 0));
> +
> + /* Still, TSYNC succeeds, bringing the threads in sync again. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd,
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t2));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t1, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t2, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> +struct thread_restrict_data {
> + pthread_t t;
> + int ruleset_fd;
> + int result;
> +};
> +
> +void *thread_restrict(void *data)
> +{
> + struct thread_restrict_data *d = data;
> +
> + d->result = landlock_restrict_self(d->ruleset_fd,
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +TEST(competing_enablement)
> +{
> + const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata);
> + struct thread_restrict_data d[] = {
> + { .ruleset_fd = ruleset_fd },
> + { .ruleset_fd = ruleset_fd },
> + };
> +
> + disable_caps(_metadata);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&d[0].t, NULL, thread_restrict, &d[0]));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&d[1].t, NULL, thread_restrict, &d[1]));
> +
> + /* Wait for threads to finish. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(d[0].t, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(d[1].t, NULL));
> +
> + /* Expect that both succeeded. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, d[0].result);
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, d[1].result);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> --
> 2.52.0.177.g9f829587af-goog
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 11:51 [PATCH v3 0/3] Landlock multithreaded enforcement Günther Noack
2025-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Günther Noack
2025-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] landlock: selftests for LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC Günther Noack
2026-02-05 18:54 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2025-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] landlock: Document LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC Günther Noack
2026-02-05 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Landlock multithreaded enforcement Mickaël Salaün
2026-02-11 14:55 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205.yooDuch4phae@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox