public inbox for linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: Yihan Ding <dingyihan@uniontech.com>
Cc: jannh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, m@maowtm.org,
	mic@digikod.net, paul@paul-moore.com,
	syzbot+7ea2f5e9dfd468201817@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	utilityemal77@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] landlock: Serialize TSYNC thread restriction
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 08:00:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306.0ef023ccdaa5@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306021651.744723-2-dingyihan@uniontech.com>

On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 10:16:50AM +0800, Yihan Ding wrote:
> syzbot found a deadlock in landlock_restrict_sibling_threads().
> When multiple threads concurrently call landlock_restrict_self() with
> sibling thread restriction enabled, they can deadlock by mutually
> queueing task_works on each other and then blocking in kernel space
> (waiting for the other to finish).
> 
> Fix this by serializing the TSYNC operations within the same process
> using the exec_update_lock. This prevents concurrent invocations
> from deadlocking.
> 
> We use down_write_trylock() and restart the syscall if the lock
> cannot be acquired immediately. This ensures that if a thread fails
> to get the lock, it will return to userspace, allowing it to process
> any pending TSYNC task_works from the lock holder, and then
> transparently restart the syscall.
> 
> Fixes: 42fc7e6543f6 ("landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self()")
> Reported-by: syzbot+7ea2f5e9dfd468201817@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7ea2f5e9dfd468201817
> Reported-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aacKOr1wywSSOAVv@suesslenovo/
> Suggested-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
> Tested-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yihan Ding <dingyihan@uniontech.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Just simple formatting changes, no code changes.
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Use restart_syscall() instead of returning -ERESTARTNOINTR.
>   This ensures the syscall is properly restarted without leaking the
>   internal error code to userspace, fixing a test failure in
>   tsync_test.competing_enablement. (Caught by Justin Suess, suggested
>   by Tingmao Wang).
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Replaced down_write_killable() with down_write_trylock() and
>   returned -ERESTARTNOINTR to avoid a secondary deadlock caused by
>   blocking the execution of task_works. (Caught by Günther Noack).
> 
> ---
>  security/landlock/tsync.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/tsync.c b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> index de01aa899751..1f460b9ec833 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/tsync.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,15 @@ int landlock_restrict_sibling_threads(const struct cred *old_cred,
>  	shared_ctx.old_cred = old_cred;
>  	shared_ctx.new_cred = new_cred;
>  	shared_ctx.set_no_new_privs = task_no_new_privs(current);
> +	/*
> +	 * Serialize concurrent TSYNC operations to prevent deadlocks when
> +	 * multiple threads call landlock_restrict_self() simultaneously.
> +	 * If the lock is already held, we gracefully yield by restarting the
> +	 * syscall. This allows the current thread to process pending
> +	 * task_works before retrying.
> +	 */
> +	if (!down_write_trylock(&current->signal->exec_update_lock))
> +		return restart_syscall();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We schedule a pseudo-signal task_work for each of the calling task's
> @@ -556,6 +565,6 @@ int landlock_restrict_sibling_threads(const struct cred *old_cred,
>  		wait_for_completion(&shared_ctx.all_finished);
>  
>  	tsync_works_release(&works);
> -
> +	up_write(&current->signal->exec_update_lock);
>  	return atomic_read(&shared_ctx.preparation_error);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Thank you!

Tested-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06  2:16 [PATCH v5 0/2] landlock: Fix TSYNC deadlock and clean up error path Yihan Ding
2026-03-06  2:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] landlock: Serialize TSYNC thread restriction Yihan Ding
2026-03-06  7:00   ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-03-06  2:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] landlock: Clean up interrupted thread logic in TSYNC Yihan Ding
2026-03-06  7:00   ` Günther Noack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260306.0ef023ccdaa5@gnoack.org \
    --to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=dingyihan@uniontech.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@maowtm.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=syzbot+7ea2f5e9dfd468201817@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox