From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: Yihan Ding <dingyihan@uniontech.com>
Cc: jannh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, m@maowtm.org,
mic@digikod.net, paul@paul-moore.com,
syzbot+7ea2f5e9dfd468201817@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
utilityemal77@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] landlock: Clean up interrupted thread logic in TSYNC
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 08:00:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306.4fc6e59bb3d7@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306021651.744723-3-dingyihan@uniontech.com>
On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 10:16:51AM +0800, Yihan Ding wrote:
> In landlock_restrict_sibling_threads(), when the calling thread is
> interrupted while waiting for sibling threads to prepare, it executes
> a recovery path.
>
> Previously, this path included a wait_for_completion() call on
> all_prepared to prevent a Use-After-Free of the local shared_ctx.
> However, this wait is redundant. Exiting the main do-while loop
> already leads to a bottom cleanup section that unconditionally waits
> for all_finished. Therefore, replacing the wait with a simple break
> is safe, prevents UAF, and correctly unblocks the remaining task_works.
>
> Clean up the error path by breaking the loop and updating the
> surrounding comments to accurately reflect the state machine.
>
> Suggested-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yihan Ding <dingyihan@uniontech.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3, v4, v5:
> - No changes.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Replaced wait_for_completion(&shared_ctx.all_prepared) with a break
> statement based on the realization that the bottom wait for 'all_finished'
> already guards against UAF.
> - Updated comments for clarity.
> ---
> security/landlock/tsync.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/tsync.c b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> index 1f460b9ec833..d52583ee1d93 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/tsync.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> @@ -536,24 +536,27 @@ int landlock_restrict_sibling_threads(const struct cred *old_cred,
> -ERESTARTNOINTR);
>
> /*
> - * Cancel task works for tasks that did not start running yet,
> - * and decrement all_prepared and num_unfinished accordingly.
> + * Opportunistic improvement: try to cancel task works for
> + * tasks that did not start running yet. We do not have a
> + * guarantee that it cancels any of the enqueued task works
> + * because task_work_run() might already have dequeued them.
> */
> cancel_tsync_works(&works, &shared_ctx);
>
> /*
> - * The remaining task works have started running, so waiting for
> - * their completion will finish.
> + * Break the loop with error. The cleanup code after the loop
> + * unblocks the remaining task_works.
> */
> - wait_for_completion(&shared_ctx.all_prepared);
> + break;
> }
> }
> } while (found_more_threads &&
> !atomic_read(&shared_ctx.preparation_error));
>
> /*
> - * We now have all sibling threads blocking and in "prepared" state in the
> - * task work. Ask all threads to commit.
> + * We now have either (a) all sibling threads blocking and in "prepared"
> + * state in the task work, or (b) the preparation error is set. Ask all
> + * threads to commit (or abort).
> */
> complete_all(&shared_ctx.ready_to_commit);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thank you!
Tested-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 2:16 [PATCH v5 0/2] landlock: Fix TSYNC deadlock and clean up error path Yihan Ding
2026-03-06 2:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] landlock: Serialize TSYNC thread restriction Yihan Ding
2026-03-06 7:00 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-06 2:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] landlock: Clean up interrupted thread logic in TSYNC Yihan Ding
2026-03-06 7:00 ` Günther Noack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306.4fc6e59bb3d7@gnoack.org \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=dingyihan@uniontech.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=syzbot+7ea2f5e9dfd468201817@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox