From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
"Justin Suess" <utilityemal77@gmail.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Samasth Norway Ananda" <samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com>,
"Matthieu Buffet" <matthieu@buffet.re>,
"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com,
"Demi Marie Obenour" <demiobenour@gmail.com>,
"Alyssa Ross" <hi@alyssa.is>,
"Tahera Fahimi" <fahimitahera@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] landlock: Control pathname UNIX domain socket resolution by path
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:15:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318111507.1nr6rAki@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315222150.121952-4-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
On 2026-03-15 23:21:44 [+0100], Günther Noack wrote:
> --- a/security/landlock/fs.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
…
> @@ -1557,6 +1560,110 @@ static int hook_path_truncate(const struct path *const path)
…
> +static int hook_unix_find(const struct path *const path, struct sock *other,
> + int flags)
> +{
…
> + /* Checks the layers in which we are connecting within the same domain. */
> + unix_state_lock(other);
> + if (unlikely(sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD) || !other->sk_socket ||
> + !other->sk_socket->file)) {
> + unix_state_unlock(other);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + dom_other = landlock_cred(other->sk_socket->file->f_cred)->domain;
> + unix_state_unlock(other);
> +
> + unmask_scoped_access(subject->domain, dom_other, &layer_masks,
> + fs_resolve_unix.fs);
This might be obvious but in case it is not: You obtain the domain
pointer from f_cred->security. Within the unix_state_lock() block the fd
can not be closed. Once you drop the lock, the fd can be closed. What
guarantees that the domain/ dom_other point remains valid between
unix_state_unlock() and after unmask_scoped_access()?
Is this invoked within a RCU section which would delay put_cred_rcu() or
is there other magic involved?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 22:21 [PATCH v6 0/9] landlock: UNIX connect() control by pathname and scope Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] lsm: Add LSM hook security_unix_find Günther Noack
2026-03-17 21:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-17 21:34 ` Paul Moore
2026-03-17 23:20 ` [PATCH v7 " Justin Suess
2026-03-18 1:28 ` Paul Moore
2026-03-18 8:48 ` [PATCH v6 " Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-18 14:44 ` Paul Moore
2026-03-18 16:22 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-18 16:43 ` Paul Moore
2026-03-23 14:37 ` Georgia Garcia
2026-03-23 20:26 ` Paul Moore
2026-03-18 16:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] landlock: use mem_is_zero() in is_layer_masks_allowed() Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:52 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 10:50 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] landlock: Control pathname UNIX domain socket resolution by path Günther Noack
2026-03-18 11:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-03-18 14:14 ` Justin Suess
2026-03-18 15:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 16:26 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-18 16:43 ` Justin Suess
2026-03-18 17:52 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 12:28 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:52 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 16:15 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-20 17:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 22:25 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-21 9:09 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-23 15:31 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] samples/landlock: Add support for named UNIX domain socket restrictions Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] landlock/selftests: Test LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:53 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 10:51 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] landlock/selftests: Audit test for LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:53 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] landlock/selftests: Check that coredump sockets stay unrestricted Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:53 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 16:44 ` Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] landlock/selftests: fs_test: Simplify ruleset creation and enforcement Günther Noack
2026-03-15 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] landlock: Document FS access right for pathname UNIX sockets Günther Noack
2026-03-18 16:54 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-03-20 17:04 ` Günther Noack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260318111507.1nr6rAki@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=fahimitahera@gmail.com \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=hi@alyssa.is \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox