From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/landlock: Test OverlayFS renames w/o LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 11:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260411090944.3131168-6-gnoack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260411090944.3131168-2-gnoack@google.com>
Even though OverlayFS uses vfs_rename() with RENAME_WHITEOUT under the
hood, and even though RENAME_WHITEOUT requires
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR, a process that renames files in an OverlayFS
can do so without having the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR right in that
location. This works because OverlayFS uses the credentials determined at
mount time for the internal vfs_rename() operation.
Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
---
security/landlock/fs.c | 11 +++++---
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 2b84a229e4d8..9b49f6c3e5da 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -1523,11 +1523,14 @@ static int hook_path_rename(const struct path *const old_dir,
int err;
/*
- * This check would better be done together with other path
- * walks which are already happening for the normal rename check
- * in current_check_refer_path().
+ * Rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT creates a whiteout object
+ * (character device file with major=minor=0) in the old
+ * location, so we check the access right for creating that.
+ *
+ * See Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst and renameat2(2).
*/
- err = current_check_access_path(old_dir, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR);
+ err = current_check_access_path(old_dir,
+ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR);
if (err)
return err;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index d867016e3fd3..4cf6fc0bcb71 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -6962,6 +6962,37 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, same_content_different_file)
}
}
+TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, rename_in_overlay_without_make_char)
+{
+ struct stat st;
+ const char *merge_fl1_renamed = MERGE_DATA "/fl1_renamed";
+
+ if (self->skip_test)
+ SKIP(return, "overlayfs is not supported (test)");
+
+ enforce_fs(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Execute a regular file rename within OverlayFS.
+ * merge_fl1 originates from lower layer, so this triggers a copy-up
+ * and creation of a whiteout in the upper layer.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, rename(merge_fl1, merge_fl1_renamed));
+
+ /* Check that the rename worked. */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(merge_fl1_renamed, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, stat(merge_fl1, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, errno);
+
+ /*
+ * Check that the whiteout object on the underlying "upper" filesystem
+ * exists after the rename. This is OK because it was done with the
+ * credentials of the OverlayFS.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(UPPER_DATA "/fl1", &st));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(S_ISCHR(st.st_mode));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, st.st_rdev);
+}
FIXTURE(layout3_fs)
{
--
2.54.0.rc0.605.g598a273b03-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-11 9:09 [PATCH 0/3] landlock: Restrict renameat2 with RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-04-11 9:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] landlock: Require LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR for RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-04-11 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/landlock: Add test for RENAME_WHITEOUT denial Günther Noack
2026-04-11 9:09 ` Günther Noack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260411090944.3131168-6-gnoack@google.com \
--to=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox