From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Stephen Smalley" <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/landlock: Test OverlayFS renames w/o LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513160552.4022649-4-gnoack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513160552.4022649-1-gnoack@google.com>
Even though OverlayFS uses vfs_rename() with RENAME_WHITEOUT, and even
though RENAME_WHITEOUT requires LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT, a process
that renames files in an OverlayFS can do so without having the
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT right in that location.
This works, and is supposed to work, because OverlayFS uses the credentials
determined at mount time for the internal vfs_rename() operation. -- The
rename happens with the credentials of the user who mounted the OverlayFS.
Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index bdad92195f62..0c29887278d0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -6963,6 +6963,37 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, same_content_different_file)
}
}
+TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, rename_in_overlay_without_make_whiteout)
+{
+ struct stat st;
+ const char *merge_fl1_renamed = MERGE_DATA "/fl1_renamed";
+
+ if (self->skip_test)
+ SKIP(return, "overlayfs is not supported (test)");
+
+ enforce_fs(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Execute a regular file rename within OverlayFS.
+ * merge_fl1 originates from lower layer, so this triggers a copy-up
+ * and creation of a whiteout in the upper layer.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, rename(merge_fl1, merge_fl1_renamed));
+
+ /* Check that the rename worked. */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(merge_fl1_renamed, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, stat(merge_fl1, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, errno);
+
+ /*
+ * Check that the whiteout object on the underlying "upper" filesystem
+ * exists after the rename. This is OK because it was done with the
+ * credentials of the OverlayFS.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(UPPER_DATA "/fl1", &st));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(S_ISCHR(st.st_mode));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, st.st_rdev);
+}
FIXTURE(layout3_fs)
{
--
2.54.0.563.g4f69b47b94-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 16:05 [PATCH v2 0/3] landlock: Restrict renameat2 with RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] landlock: Require LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT for RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/landlock: Add test for RENAME_WHITEOUT denial Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` Günther Noack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513160552.4022649-4-gnoack@google.com \
--to=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox