Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Daniel Durning" <danieldurning.work@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Justin Suess" <utilityemal77@gmail.com>,
	"Lennart Poettering" <lennart@poettering.net>,
	"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
	"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
	"Shervin Oloumi" <enlightened@google.com>,
	"Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
	kernel-team@cloudflare.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] landlock: Wrap per-layer access masks in struct layer_config
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 20:11:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527181127.879771-4-mic@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527181127.879771-1-mic@digikod.net>

The per-layer FAM in struct landlock_ruleset currently stores struct
access_masks directly, but upcoming permission features (capability and
namespace restrictions) need additional per-layer data beyond the
handled-access bitfields.

Introduce struct layer_config as a wrapper around struct access_masks
and rename the FAM from access_masks[] to layers[].  This makes room for
future per-layer fields (e.g. allowed bitmasks) without modifying struct
access_masks itself, which is also used as a lightweight parameter type
for functions that only need the handled-access bitfields.

No functional change.

Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260312100444.2609563-5-mic@digikod.net
- Add Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang.
- Address Günther Noack's review nits:
  - Clarify that _LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED is ORed with
    the .handled field of all ruleset->layers[] entries (not the
    entries themselves).
  - Rename landlock_upgrade_handled_access_masks() to
    landlock_upgrade_handled_layer_config() to match the parameter
    type.
  - Rewrap the @layers kdoc in struct landlock_ruleset.
- Rename struct layer_rights to struct layer_config: "config" is
  the more general term for per-layer state.
- Add Reviewed-by: Günther Noack.
---
 security/landlock/access.h   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 security/landlock/cred.h     |  2 +-
 security/landlock/ruleset.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
 security/landlock/ruleset.h  | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 security/landlock/syscalls.c |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/landlock/access.h b/security/landlock/access.h
index c19d5bc13944..fba9babc8e45 100644
--- a/security/landlock/access.h
+++ b/security/landlock/access.h
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
 
 /*
  * All access rights that are denied by default whether they are handled or not
- * by a ruleset/layer.  This must be ORed with all ruleset->access_masks[]
- * entries when we need to get the absolute handled access masks, see
- * landlock_upgrade_handled_access_masks().
+ * by a ruleset/layer.  This must be ORed with the .handled field of all
+ * ruleset->layers[] entries when we need to get the absolute handled access
+ * masks, see landlock_upgrade_handled_layer_config().
  */
 /* clang-format off */
 #define _LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED ( \
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(access_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_NUM_SCOPE);
 /* Makes sure for_each_set_bit() and for_each_clear_bit() calls are OK. */
 static_assert(sizeof(unsigned long) >= sizeof(access_mask_t));
 
-/* Ruleset access masks. */
+/* Handled access masks (bitfields only). */
 struct access_masks {
 	access_mask_t fs : LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS;
 	access_mask_t net : LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET;
@@ -61,6 +61,21 @@ union access_masks_all {
 static_assert(sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, masks)) ==
 	      sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, all)));
 
+/**
+ * struct layer_config - Per-layer access configuration
+ *
+ * Wraps the handled-access bitfields together with any additional per-layer
+ * data (e.g. allowed bitmasks added by future patches).  This is the element
+ * type of the &struct landlock_ruleset.layers FAM.
+ */
+struct layer_config {
+	/**
+	 * @handled: Bitmask of access rights handled (i.e. restricted) by this
+	 * layer.
+	 */
+	struct access_masks handled;
+};
+
 /**
  * struct layer_access_masks - A boolean matrix of layers and access rights
  *
@@ -100,17 +115,17 @@ static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(deny_masks_t) >=
 static_assert(HWEIGHT(LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS) == 1);
 
 /* Upgrades with all initially denied by default access rights. */
-static inline struct access_masks
-landlock_upgrade_handled_access_masks(struct access_masks access_masks)
+static inline struct layer_config
+landlock_upgrade_handled_layer_config(struct layer_config layer_config)
 {
 	/*
 	 * All access rights that are denied by default whether they are
 	 * explicitly handled or not.
 	 */
-	if (access_masks.fs)
-		access_masks.fs |= _LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED;
+	if (layer_config.handled.fs)
+		layer_config.handled.fs |= _LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED;
 
-	return access_masks;
+	return layer_config;
 }
 
 /* Checks the subset relation between access masks. */
diff --git a/security/landlock/cred.h b/security/landlock/cred.h
index f287c56b5fd4..3e2a7e88710e 100644
--- a/security/landlock/cred.h
+++ b/security/landlock/cred.h
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ landlock_get_applicable_subject(const struct cred *const cred,
 	for (layer_level = domain->num_layers - 1; layer_level >= 0;
 	     layer_level--) {
 		union access_masks_all layer = {
-			.masks = domain->access_masks[layer_level],
+			.masks = domain->layers[layer_level].handled,
 		};
 
 		if (layer.all & masks_all.all) {
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index 181df7736bb9..04219ec8bab3 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
 {
 	struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;
 
-	new_ruleset = kzalloc_flex(*new_ruleset, access_masks, num_layers,
+	new_ruleset = kzalloc_flex(*new_ruleset, layers, num_layers,
 				   GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!new_ruleset)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
 
 	new_ruleset->num_layers = num_layers;
 	/*
-	 * hierarchy = NULL
-	 * num_rules = 0
-	 * access_masks[] = 0
+	 * - hierarchy = NULL
+	 * - num_rules = 0
+	 * - layers[] = 0
 	 */
 	return new_ruleset;
 }
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
-	dst->access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] =
-		landlock_upgrade_handled_access_masks(src->access_masks[0]);
+	dst->layers[dst->num_layers - 1] =
+		landlock_upgrade_handled_layer_config(src->layers[0]);
 
 	/* Merges the @src inode tree. */
 	err = merge_tree(dst, src, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
@@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	/* Copies the parent layer stack and leaves a space for the new layer. */
-	memcpy(child->access_masks, parent->access_masks,
-	       flex_array_size(parent, access_masks, parent->num_layers));
+	memcpy(child->layers, parent->layers,
+	       flex_array_size(parent, layers, parent->num_layers));
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent->hierarchy)) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index 889f4b30301a..324df551987c 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
 		 * @work_free: Enables to free a ruleset within a lockless
 		 * section.  This is only used by
 		 * landlock_put_ruleset_deferred() when @usage reaches zero.
-		 * The fields @lock, @usage, @num_rules, @num_layers and
-		 * @access_masks are then unused.
+		 * The fields @lock, @usage, @num_rules, @num_layers and @layers
+		 * are then unused.
 		 */
 		struct work_struct work_free;
 		struct {
@@ -173,18 +173,18 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
 			 */
 			u32 num_layers;
 			/**
-			 * @access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem and
-			 * network actions that are restricted by a ruleset.
+			 * @layers: Per-layer access configuration, including
+			 * handled access masks and allowed permission bitmasks.
 			 * A domain saves all layers of merged rulesets in a
 			 * stack (FAM), starting from the first layer to the
 			 * last one.  These layers are used when merging
-			 * rulesets, for user space backward compatibility
-			 * (i.e. future-proof), and to properly handle merged
-			 * rulesets without overlapping access rights.  These
-			 * layers are set once and never changed for the
-			 * lifetime of the ruleset.
+			 * rulesets, for user space backward compatibility (i.e.
+			 * future-proof), and to properly handle merged rulesets
+			 * without overlapping access rights.  These layers are
+			 * set once and never changed for the lifetime of the
+			 * ruleset.
 			 */
-			struct access_masks access_masks[];
+			struct layer_config layers[] __counted_by(num_layers);
 		};
 	};
 };
@@ -224,7 +224,8 @@ static inline void landlock_get_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset)
  *
  * @domain: Landlock ruleset (used as a domain)
  *
- * Return: An access_masks result of the OR of all the domain's access masks.
+ * Return: An access_masks result of the OR of all the domain's handled access
+ * masks.
  */
 static inline struct access_masks
 landlock_union_access_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
@@ -234,7 +235,7 @@ landlock_union_access_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
 
 	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
 		union access_masks_all layer = {
-			.masks = domain->access_masks[layer_level],
+			.masks = domain->layers[layer_level].handled,
 		};
 
 		matches.all |= layer.all;
@@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ landlock_add_fs_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 
 	/* Should already be checked in sys_landlock_create_ruleset(). */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(fs_access_mask != fs_mask);
-	ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].fs |= fs_mask;
+	ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.fs |= fs_mask;
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ landlock_add_net_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 
 	/* Should already be checked in sys_landlock_create_ruleset(). */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(net_access_mask != net_mask);
-	ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].net |= net_mask;
+	ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.net |= net_mask;
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -275,7 +276,7 @@ landlock_add_scope_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 
 	/* Should already be checked in sys_landlock_create_ruleset(). */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(scope_mask != mask);
-	ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].scope |= mask;
+	ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.scope |= mask;
 }
 
 static inline access_mask_t
@@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 			    const u16 layer_level)
 {
 	/* Handles all initially denied by default access rights. */
-	return ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].fs |
+	return ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.fs |
 	       _LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED;
 }
 
@@ -291,14 +292,14 @@ static inline access_mask_t
 landlock_get_net_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 			     const u16 layer_level)
 {
-	return ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].net;
+	return ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.net;
 }
 
 static inline access_mask_t
 landlock_get_scope_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 			const u16 layer_level)
 {
-	return ruleset->access_masks[layer_level].scope;
+	return ruleset->layers[layer_level].handled.scope;
 }
 
 bool landlock_unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
index d45469d5d464..702b4ab6b733 100644
--- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c
+++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int add_rule_path_beneath(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
 		return -ENOMSG;
 
 	/* Checks that allowed_access matches the @ruleset constraints. */
-	mask = ruleset->access_masks[0].fs;
+	mask = ruleset->layers[0].handled.fs;
 	if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | mask) != mask)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-27 18:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Landlock: Namespace and capability control Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] security: add LSM blob and hooks for namespaces Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] security: Add LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NS for namespace audit records Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] landlock: Enforce namespace use restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] landlock: Enforce capability restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] selftests/landlock: Add namespace restriction tests Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] selftests/landlock: Add capability " Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] samples/landlock: Add capability and namespace restriction support Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] landlock: Add documentation for capability and namespace restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-06-01  9:37   ` Günther Noack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260527181127.879771-4-mic@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=danieldurning.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=enlightened@google.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@maowtm.org \
    --cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox