From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] hardening: Default randstruct off with rust for better allmodconfig support
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:50:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605-rust-reverse-randstruct-dep-v2-1-93d38023b6f9@kernel.org> (raw)
Currently randstruct does not support rust so we have Kconfig dependencies
which prevent rust being enabled when randstruct is. Unfortunately this
prevents rust being enabled in allmodconfig, our standard coverage build.
randstruct gets turned on by default, then the dependency on !RANDSTRUCT
causes rust to get disabled.
Work around this by disabling randstruct by default if we have a usable
rust toolchain and rust support for the architecture, circular
dependencies prevent us directly depending on !RUST. This means we might
end up with a configuration that disables both rust and randstruct but
hopefully it's more likely go give the expected result.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add a HAVE_RUST in there too.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260605-rust-reverse-randstruct-dep-v1-1-45ce9ee8d0d1@kernel.org
---
security/Kconfig.hardening | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/Kconfig.hardening b/security/Kconfig.hardening
index 86f8768c63d4..923e7710f005 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig.hardening
+++ b/security/Kconfig.hardening
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ config CC_HAS_RANDSTRUCT
choice
prompt "Randomize layout of sensitive kernel structures"
- default RANDSTRUCT_FULL if COMPILE_TEST && (GCC_PLUGINS || CC_HAS_RANDSTRUCT)
+ default RANDSTRUCT_FULL if !(RUST_IS_AVAILABLE && HAVE_RUST) && COMPILE_TEST && (GCC_PLUGINS || CC_HAS_RANDSTRUCT)
default RANDSTRUCT_NONE
help
If you enable this, the layouts of structures that are entirely
---
base-commit: e43ffb69e0438cddd72aaa30898b4dc446f664f8
change-id: 20260605-rust-reverse-randstruct-dep-5a504c861128
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 16:50 Mark Brown [this message]
2026-06-05 17:22 ` [PATCH v2] hardening: Default randstruct off with rust for better allmodconfig support Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605-rust-reverse-randstruct-dep-v2-1-93d38023b6f9@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox