From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-190f.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-190f.mail.infomaniak.ch [185.125.25.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11114405C42 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.125.25.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781537863; cv=none; b=dpgxEyU+w4fLkkRUwg03Q1NqewgwWnbABiCP91Z6RiPhmPkMtBoEilk0mKKyfjr9AmorXhyONCOREKUsL0kkMaBC/xykqydrnBNEZbU2dKf7XaP2yzjdZZ2MbUTRQN/HdM9ycMhQLlRKnA/pvhP58HienVR7i7NGl2jWUNf4ssc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781537863; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MVs6ydmQyV+2JiC6AldWnCkiZDooScRxa9ANNJhFvOM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=ozcpC5fkwyXojD7tV2yevu6sWKoZGKS4NvK5qZ6G/FbWp7PfsN33bZQi4oC3qWMb2eqLFAzVZH2Tlfg9yNn+rVWqtedhCWMOQtP4Un/JSO0QrA0Oj+KJRbiZ4sywglpQZPCO0TotNwLiy4CpAiGM9PYzKR7rVZXN4IvTO7Buaos= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=epNw6lR1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.125.25.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="epNw6lR1" Received: from smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.4.36.107]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gfDlG2vSTznKp; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:37:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1781537850; bh=iqru0mS2JmyVUk/H/reLzbURxryDJTahjJRy6gpZdOQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=epNw6lR1Xmk1zy6rQwol9blZ4AuJap/YegFoiaZZgeF90aVkZGWlEJG5TbAvuja4c MIFbmmWg4+zAZodj2PdoS4nvFbi/2pyRb/sXGMPWOIfMGhrFZuiDzvtasob2yFEs+q uiYHYjCxAj3Sjdx3LvKuo4VrBKZ0I7NogZCgJtFQ= Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4gfDlF2ZmGzffs; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:37:24 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: sashiko@lists.linux.dev, Roman Gushchin , =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack Subject: Sashiko reviews for the LSM mailing list Message-ID: <20260615.zeinurej8oZ9@digikod.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha Hi, I've been reading Sashiko's (AI bot) reviews wrt Landlock patches, and most of them were valuable. It found issues (security or not), but it requires to go to https://sashiko.dev to find them, which is too easy to forget, and requires additional work from maintainers to copy or point to these reviews. I sent a PR (currently in draft) to enable email replies from Sashiko to the Linux Security Module mailing list (most patches are already reviewed anyway): https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/278 Making such reviews broadly available can improve the quality of patches we receive without much noise, helping for all LSM-related code. We can fine tune some email-related settings if needed. If there are any concern or question, this is the right time to start a discussion. Regards, Mickaël