[PATCH] security: clarify task_prctl hook documentation

[Bill Roberts <bill.roberts@arm.com>]

The task_prctl hook comment incorrectly described the hook as checking
whether a prctl operation is allowed. In reality, the hook exists for
LSMs to handle LSM-specific prctl operations.

Update the function description and kernel-doc comment to reflect the
actual behavior. The old wording appears to have been copied from other
permission-check hooks despite differing semantics.

Signed-off-by: Bill Roberts <bill.roberts@arm.com>
---
 security/security.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 4e999f023651..96e6ef088801 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -3301,15 +3301,14 @@ int security_task_kill(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_siginfo *info,
 }
 
 /**
- * security_task_prctl() - Check if a prctl op is allowed
+ * security_task_prctl() - Handle an LSM specific prctl call
  * @option: operation
  * @arg2: argument
  * @arg3: argument
  * @arg4: argument
  * @arg5: argument
  *
- * Check permission before performing a process control operation on the
- * current process.
+ * Handle lsm specific prctl operations.
  *
  * Return: Return -ENOSYS if no-one wanted to handle this op, any other value
  *         to cause prctl() to return immediately with that value.
-- 
2.54.0