From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A219F27FD51; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782457721; cv=none; b=Squ22s/xWfR7nGq/8xhcTFLSyfEKUQY0XjTMKflioF+JLycrEYmSmY+n/6mpn7zd0iO8hmDoUq+C1p25LhrVEPjVTS9qDyNfJ5Yd/Y5npPDrkuILm8LaSA2pPdTl0YUvWd1aPbSaq9i+mRPtmEkxh93ZYV759Bv8YT5GSYRnYKA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782457721; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jEdDswGvs0SXZNje9yffbrjrkR2Zw9Wo/fCNd/kmlUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l/jxzz24Gc+WG3cbYYISjcjmZvemiUZ7dFRXVQWUugrJCxojiOtGhLYqKISBGy8ZeYXzmasgRkKDhY31/WVgNX+6YqN36i5tTpOrmPSukD1BoyTss1//K6tVMDJtf7Pbz6soMl6XnN4uf4rkOgUO3mwe5yJY5LglzBqyvdS/aME= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ovbIpnoq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="ovbIpnoq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F04F51F000E9; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:08:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1782457717; bh=jEdDswGvs0SXZNje9yffbrjrkR2Zw9Wo/fCNd/kmlUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ovbIpnoq18k2w1g50a5UKNCa4Ag/wsDqLWG8hpzJdx7XIdZ0sPFhGMxpFqT1lYDEL lvzT9QAF9f9msACFhjkFEmUQh+LFjuz81bASw5H/EHo0hu+pxPNhQSsIedQvAqHnwT ECaSQcpMDw6pJtb9q1+qkZ71R4cMS5DxG2VtfH7M= Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:07:25 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Cai Xinchen Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, miklos@szeredi.hu, amir73il@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, omosnace@redhat.com, bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 stable/linux-6.18.y 0/2] Backport Fix incorrect overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() LSM access controls Message-ID: <2026062605-broadways-stuffy-2ec4@gregkh> References: <20260626024058.3149217-1-caixinchen1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260626024058.3149217-1-caixinchen1@huawei.com> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 10:40:56AM +0800, Cai Xinchen wrote: > v2: Add static to struct kmem_cache *lsm_backing_file_cache; and define > lbs_backing_file as int for keeping the same type as 6.18. Why are you not actually cc: stable@vger.kernel.org on backports you want to see applied there? confused, greg k-h