From: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] keys: fix keyring assoc-array out-of-bounds read and index inconsistency
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:54:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714115451.3773164-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> (raw)
An unprivileged keyring whose keys collide through the description-chunk
path can drive assoc_array node splitting into an out-of-bounds slot write.
Patch 1 stops the out-of-bounds read in keyring_get_key_chunk(); patch 2
makes the chunk byte order agree with keyring_diff_objects(); patch 3 fixes
the shortcut-walk trim so the walk cannot be steered down the wrong
descendant.
v2 changes (patch 3 only; patches 1 and 2 are unchanged):
As sashiko pointed out, the v1 patch-3 guard (sc_level + CHUNK >
skip_to_level) fixed the word-aligned leak but wrongly fired for an
unaligned first word whose skip_to_level sits on the next chunk
boundary: shift = skip_to_level & CHUNK_MASK is then 0 and the trim clears
the whole dissimilarity word, making a differing shortcut compare equal. v2
keys the trim on the end of the chunk that contains sc_level,
round_down(sc_level, CHUNK) + CHUNK, which matches a brute-force oracle over
every sc_level/skip_to_level pair; the original round_up guard and the v1
guard each disagree with the oracle in one regime.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/20260712014500.480410-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com/
Michael Bommarito (3):
keys: fix out-of-bounds read in keyring_get_key_chunk()
keys: make keyring key-chunk byte order agree with keyring_diff_objects()
assoc_array: trim the final shortcut word using the current chunk end
lib/assoc_array.c | 3 ++-
security/keys/keyring.c | 15 ++++++++-------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 11:54 Michael Bommarito [this message]
2026-07-14 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] keys: fix out-of-bounds read in keyring_get_key_chunk() Michael Bommarito
2026-07-14 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] keys: make keyring key-chunk byte order agree with keyring_diff_objects() Michael Bommarito
2026-07-14 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] assoc_array: trim the final shortcut word using the current chunk end Michael Bommarito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714115451.3773164-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--to=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox