From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Cc: gnoack3000@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/landlock: Test LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731.ChohN2vub4ah@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717220320.1030123-3-utilityemal77@gmail.com>
These tests are good.
Please run clang-format on these files.
Also, we can use the same max_layres pattern to check the errno and the
state of NNP for the calling thread (when the call failed).
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Justin Suess wrote:
> Check that a successful landlock_restrict_self(2) call with
> LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS sets no_new_privs without a prior
> prctl(2) call nor CAP_SYS_ADMIN, that a failed call leaves the attribute
> unchanged, and that LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC extends it to sibling
> threads. Also check that this flag requires a ruleset, and update the
> restrict_self_checks_ordering EPERM checks since this flag is now
> checked before the flags validity.
>
> Update the ABI version and last-flag checks accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c | 33 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> index cbd3c1669951..2d4903588903 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ TEST(abi_version)
> const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
> };
> - ASSERT_EQ(10, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
> + ASSERT_EQ(11, landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
> LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION));
>
> ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, 0,
> @@ -255,8 +255,15 @@ TEST(restrict_self_checks_ordering)
>
> /* Checks unprivileged enforcement without no_new_privs. */
> drop_caps(_metadata);
> - ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(-1, -1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> + -1, ~LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> ASSERT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
> + /*
> + * LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS fulfills the no_new_privs /
> + * CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement, so the invalid flags are checked first.
> + */
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(-1, -1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
> ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(-1, 0));
> ASSERT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
> ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, 0));
> @@ -288,7 +295,7 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd)
> EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno);
> }
>
> -TEST(restrict_self_fd_logging_flags)
> +TEST(restrict_self_fd_flags)
> {
> int fd;
>
> @@ -302,11 +309,16 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd_logging_flags)
> EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF));
> EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno);
> +
> + /* LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS requires a ruleset FD. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> + fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> + EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno);
> }
>
> -TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags)
> +TEST(restrict_self_flags)
The test renames must be mentioned in the commit message.
> {
> - const __u32 last_flag = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
> + const __u32 last_flag = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS;
>
> /* Tests invalid flag combinations. */
>
> @@ -349,6 +361,18 @@ TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags)
> LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON));
> EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno);
>
> + /* LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS requires a ruleset FD. */
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno);
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(-1,
> + landlock_restrict_self(
> + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF |
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno);
> +
> /* Tests with an invalid ruleset_fd. */
>
> EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> @@ -359,6 +383,37 @@ TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags)
> -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF));
> }
>
> +TEST(restrict_self_no_new_privs)
> +{
> + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> + .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
> + };
> + const int ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> +
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * The calling thread does not need CAP_SYS_ADMIN nor an explicit
> + * prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call.
> + */
> + drop_caps(_metadata);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + /* Checks that a failed call does not set no_new_privs. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(
> + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno);
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + /* Checks that a successful call sets no_new_privs. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(
> + ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> + EXPECT_EQ(1, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> TEST(ruleset_fd_io)
> {
> struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
> index 9cf1491bbaaf..d5336186b2c7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,39 @@ TEST(multi_threaded_success)
> EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> }
>
> +TEST(multi_threaded_no_new_privs)
> +{
> + pthread_t t1, t2;
> + bool no_new_privs1, no_new_privs2;
> + const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata);
> +
> + disable_caps(_metadata);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t1, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t2, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs2));
> +
> + /* No prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(
> + ruleset_fd,
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC |
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS));
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(1, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t1));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t2));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t1, NULL));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t2, NULL));
> +
> + /* The no_new_privs flag was enabled on all threads. */
> + EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs1);
> + EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs2);
> +
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> +
> TEST(multi_threaded_success_despite_diverging_domains)
> {
> pthread_t t1, t2;
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 22:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] Implement LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-07-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-07-31 21:29 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 22:43 ` Justin Suess
2026-07-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/landlock: Test LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-07-31 21:29 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-07-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] landlock: Document LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-07-31 21:34 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 21:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Implement LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731.ChohN2vub4ah@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox