From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] selftests/landlock: Test whiteout object behaviour in OverlayFS renames
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:43:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731.IeC9Eih4chie@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724161004.2360749-5-gnoack@google.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 06:10:03PM +0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> Even though OverlayFS uses vfs_rename() with RENAME_WHITEOUT, and even
> though RENAME_WHITEOUT requires LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG, a process that
> renames non-regular files in an OverlayFS can do so without having the
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG right in that location.
>
> This works, and is supposed to work, because OverlayFS uses the credentials
> determined at mount time for the internal vfs_rename() operation. -- The
This "--" doesn't seem useful.
> rename happens with the credentials of the user who mounted the OverlayFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
> index fe5faeca83eb..73770dbb0592 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
> @@ -6972,6 +6972,45 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, same_content_different_file)
> }
> }
>
> +TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, rename_in_overlay_without_make_reg)
> +{
> + struct stat st;
> + const char *merge_fl1_renamed = MERGE_DATA "/fl1_renamed";
> +
> + if (self->skip_test)
> + SKIP(return, "overlayfs is not supported (test)");
> +
> + /*
> + * In this test, merge_fl1 is a FIFO file. MAKE_REG is restricted, but
> + * MAKE_FIFO is allowed. Despite MAKE_REG being restricted, the rename
> + * on the OverlayFS works and creates a whiteout file in the underlying
> + * upper file system.
> + */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, unlink(merge_fl1));
merge_fl1 just became a whiteout with this unlink, so I think the test
is wrong because it doesn't check RENAME_WHITEOUT against the lower file.
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, mknod(merge_fl1, S_IFIFO, 0));
The mode should be 0600.
> + enforce_fs(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG, NULL);
> +
> + /*
> + * Execute a regular file rename within OverlayFS.
merge_fl1 is a fifo.
> + * merge_fl1 originates from lower layer, so this triggers a copy-up
> + * and creation of a whiteout in the upper layer.
> + */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, rename(merge_fl1, merge_fl1_renamed));
> +
> + /* Check that the rename worked. */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(merge_fl1_renamed, &st));
> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, stat(merge_fl1, &st));
> + EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, errno);
> +
> + /*
> + * Check that the whiteout object on the underlying "upper" filesystem
> + * exists after the rename. This is OK because it was done with the
> + * credentials of the OverlayFS.
> + */
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(UPPER_DATA "/fl1", &st));
> + EXPECT_TRUE(S_ISCHR(st.st_mode));
> + EXPECT_EQ(0, st.st_rdev);
> +}
>
> FIXTURE(layout3_fs)
> {
> --
> 2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 16:09 [PATCH v4 0/5] landlock: Restrict whiteout object creation Günther Noack
2026-07-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] selftests/landlock: Use an actual chardev for MAKE_CHAR audit test Günther Noack
2026-07-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] landlock: Require LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG for whiteout creation Günther Noack
2026-07-31 11:07 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 13:13 ` Günther Noack
2026-07-31 14:21 ` Günther Noack
2026-07-31 15:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 13:13 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 14:05 ` Günther Noack
2026-07-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/landlock: Add tests for whiteout object creation Günther Noack
2026-07-31 13:22 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-07-31 14:18 ` Günther Noack
2026-07-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] selftests/landlock: Test whiteout object behaviour in OverlayFS renames Günther Noack
2026-07-31 13:43 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-07-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] landlock: Link the erratum documentation for whiteout objects Günther Noack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731.IeC9Eih4chie@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox