From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF38547048; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789985897; cv=none; b=q6O3q6yiD9agZMbmfeqid+UXUqoU/SX9tK6f35UmrgGlpJuncfVRr2zK05svReucyd+9KECC4vGdEWCpXnZ6YYYNB1Tfwiw6RpH2DaWuL/0tqP/2+lZ6Y7IYLHVE7/6kPzf0uYN2fLnZ+dCxGRat5mrZluazBDgYR/y7Ax/hMcY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789985897; c=relaxed/simple; bh=akkou26yaO7zMdmAUOXT9IxpEFq5MFadowvbIkoJUGs=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=hkS50MNOgZG1njqF/U0kC8BcpdPo//w60ryeVA1F2EoKsOseCZUq+0g51k+xrpvI25MSZv2TbiV3eEyBHzMnm4FzZI/sh/sZWC08m9rCB5e6w2OqxubC8QKP8X3B/tGW3MvxOQdJqUv+ItnOiLcOhb+9IB8MiDDme0g9z7JoP5U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GjzIZYXc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GjzIZYXc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 211B41F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:18:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789985895; bh=akkou26yaO7zMdmAUOXT9IxpEFq5MFadowvbIkoJUGs=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=GjzIZYXcUhmZWEsG43aEDd56uDBcsr/6B5rsbS7ou8IvUlRBd1vjN8tPiomV1IN+R GAUdhIp9pz4YRF60SyPEBpkR4BULsxHP6KquEMvyz8YBhKKdZ8U25MeUYibjK+Mmoz LmIor0l68Fa9uxk+e4MWULkFjFGrspT42hvxxoPdD4LbEE96ZyZPzauubDlEPEWmxT xtzlP0trJawmnSPdFgmLT36GLU52ccPR02wy4og4+gYVMc7AHNgUSWmssl+kH2hPM2 HcxyGbqBMGDRqayRx80O06WsNjs0etMIo1glMEEXytt9zu1ye2yFJ9FbsOAYhoZ0+N IG6qjqsQor6KA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] rcu: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ye Liu" Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260921092101.89285-10-ye.liu@linux.dev> References: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> <20260921092101.89285-10-ye.liu@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:18:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921101815.211B41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Ye Liu >=20 > Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair combined > with for_each_process_thread() loop in kernel/rcu/update.c with > for_each_process_thread_rculock(), which scopes the RCU read lock > to the loop body via scoped_guard(rcu). >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ye Liu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921092101.8928= 5-1-ye.liu@linux.dev?part=3D9