From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D338D479874; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789987595; cv=none; b=nu45Q67+dN5yHL6fgY0GCHllkV3uQ32iENWc+S9cvK8JaNLNhwVy+fsU6TTIMgSjmA7A5hG5JBH5m4nigaavA9HaZu+ZyAXPsJll96D9oYio5XAnZ3vS+GvJTSR+w5jYlYb7fRYEwrc4/i76cThZcDw5FOUNdWh+NB3gHs8G+3o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789987595; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EHSLxT3gqSYO7ys2Auh+FLkixzIN1MMoDo5oQ5N8Uis=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=l/uzMEtue877CmTCyeV4wX3R20Jz9RoohV6GrhfGyM3L9GdlO5LcgpdEEnEggyddLJKLmyWPWmbF9S4owX04RjGFVn4xdQidw48C8j2zDNg3EyLygSskUIr7Kc+Wbi9Z0lqU+ulRLTvRHuQhJOVfISLSyAeTwBx2EOO3bVyY3mo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QrxtGHeS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QrxtGHeS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECECB1F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:46:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789987594; bh=EHSLxT3gqSYO7ys2Auh+FLkixzIN1MMoDo5oQ5N8Uis=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=QrxtGHeS/b32jCf9CArkIdwKKxb4h20vNOOsjuSWfnC6X+sUw7q6yWFUHfpoFTRsT dtRdIr5ApTpQUkpKDih9rYeiY/inpzjWo47XWDX5/2TiUSjMZAetpi25yS/SFI5FzZ 9x5kEOmUNHMth+8UsVwYUW4PORVCosYHh6GVWSRdF/mrSj/SrGBG4V6H8Au68ufO+7 FvNtH6sfNpep59CAIrVp8ExPcMfCaa29AoFMW/Sz2aSSX3MqpM4hNyHoSnz/JnNkzQ 8XFWulk7m/zCLhi9tPVj0v1rrLCsKhVNBDWwN1+ycd0pigKlPw4gCJdbJicEBbfeVu T0w92YaUk9jfQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ye Liu" Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260921093334.105291-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> References: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> <20260921093334.105291-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:46:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921104633.ECECB1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Ye Liu >=20 > Replace guard(rcu)() + for_each_thread() with for_each_thread_rculock(), > which scopes the RCU read lock to the loop body via scoped_guard(rcu). >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ye Liu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921092101.8928= 5-1-ye.liu@linux.dev?part=3D15