From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F0744E055 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790945409; cv=none; b=OgSyohASJ25PXxWeWGMAFdu0ekVreE0Y9BUZtAZ+mYZZCopdyGSuW4yW4CVlBoSMHfgk5HHXD05FM2ZF9YdxY8f2Uc98abjTYp59amlxHh2Njr6o9/W+sQzwtk5IwNSUrguaJ2OPC/5eMXv4pNT+lMgsIVbooozmvuYgU/r3XW4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790945409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pR8S9U3EVGGvjXDhESzjRdpjUOSuatEee3BOATy7lk0=; h=From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=Bmzb0RvETDsOYZiOOsXBQqH3yMbEoPt04YduIeJncm9Zb6x975P6FolA5OO3jWzRrbvuqznhwGGev6ma+QNnUzv/xusRAoPZLigIHijMKlmBBHcm0e9BfvZA+M7g0cYo0Sz4HEJDFZ+52Y/+48b6x+xDYKKv9Zu/0Z5I6sef8bQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QkpU8mIU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QkpU8mIU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B03151F000FF for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:50:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790945407; bh=vto3lah5dojpAo8HTuNteVWeNwjxltR+emXW4BXp3Io=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=QkpU8mIUVhZbAE8Pwqt9p2EiasUSKredAnGXQ7gW9GrhVK4oYyoQ9JYxj9gUi6HQz Yx35Q+YoSFqzpqBLgJB9fnqnOnPxS5N3NIQVWIP1BG7d0KfXzH1kMv0t95LPoE9+LE UJn9OM0jRKo133Y3dq7rLRhsha+xKz8MMT71EflPPPsEO+Gp/OYbHFdKCNmdifyIjt NFlLidXwHxNikN2o/jIm1RuZuub3TFs0bierrm+Q5njp2G4qSHTIEgDG97AXCcsbGY 47RyM8bsX0Kjyn5/m7tRmXkw6WkcamNU6xK+13T/7qU9txlFKrkbulguanWHchVl+U 1qu0uqjQMmQKA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261002124409.1277970-2-mic@digikod.net> References: <20261002124409.1277970-1-mic@digikod.net> <20261002124409.1277970-2-mic@digikod.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 12:50:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20261002125007.B03151F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The base stores the fs/net/scope quiet bitmasks in a struct access_masks > field named quiet_masks. A following commit adds the sibling struct > permission_masks field quiet_permission for capabilities and namespaces. > quiet_masks drops the access category and keeps the type half ("masks"), > while quiet_permission keeps the category and drops the type half, so > the two read as an inconsistent pair. >=20 > Rename the base field to quiet_access, giving the symmetric, > category-named pair quiet_access/quiet_permission that also matches the > UAPI handled_access_*/quiet_access_* naming. This is a > no-functional-change rename. >=20 > Cc: G=C3=BCnther Noack > Cc: Tingmao Wang > Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang > Signed-off-by: Micka=C3=ABl Sala=C3=BCn Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261002124409.1277= 970-1-mic@digikod.net?part=3D1