Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] landlock: Enforce capability restrictions
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 12:53:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002125310.314161F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002124409.1277970-5-mic@digikod.net>

> Add Landlock enforcement for capability use via the LSM capable hook.
> This lets a sandboxed process restrict which Linux capabilities it can
> exercise, using LANDLOCK_PERMISSION_CAPABILITY_USE and per-capability
> rules.
> 
> The check is a flat per-layer allowed-capabilities test, with no
> domain-ancestry bypass, no cross-namespace discriminant, and no
> dependency on the target user namespace.  These categorical denials
> return -EPERM, like the namespace permission introduced by the previous
> commit, and they mirror its per-capability allowed and quiet masks, so
> LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET stays rejected for this rule type.  Successful
> capability rules and denials are traced as the previous commit
> describes.
> 
> Enforce only at capability exercise time rather than modifying the
> [ ... ]
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261002124409.1277970-1-mic@digikod.net?part=4


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 12:43 [PATCH v4 0/8] Landlock: Namespace and capability control Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] landlock: Wrap per-layer access masks in struct layer_config Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] landlock: Enforce namespace use restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] landlock: Enforce capability restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:53   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] selftests/landlock: Add namespace restriction tests Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06  9:56     ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] selftests/landlock: Add capability " Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06  9:57     ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] samples/landlock: Add capability and namespace restriction support Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06  9:57     ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] landlock: Add documentation for capability and namespace restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-02 12:59   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261002125310.314161F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox