From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Eric Paris" <eparis@redhat.com>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Ben Scarlato" <akhna@google.com>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Charles Zaffery" <czaffery@roblox.com>,
"Francis Laniel" <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Jeff Xu" <jeffxu@google.com>,
"Jorge Lucangeli Obes" <jorgelo@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Konstantin Meskhidze" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
"Matt Bobrowski" <mattbobrowski@google.com>,
"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
"Phil Sutter" <phil@nwl.cc>,
"Praveen K Paladugu" <prapal@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Robert Salvet" <robert.salvet@roblox.com>,
"Shervin Oloumi" <enlightened@google.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Tahera Fahimi" <fahimitahera@gmail.com>,
audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] landlock: Log domain properties and release
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 20:23:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <237bfe2be7b4ba5d59b3b832c23622bb@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241122143353.59367-11-mic@digikod.net>
On Nov 22, 2024 =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <mic@digikod.net> wrote:
>
> TODO: Update sample with audit's creation time and now-removed parent
> hierarchy
>
> Asynchronously log domain information when it first denies an access.
> This minimize the amount of generated logs, which makes it possible to
> always log denials since they should not happen (except with the new
> LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOGLESS flag). These records are identified by
> AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_INFO.
>
> Log domain deletion with the AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_DROP record type when
> a domain was previously logged. This makes it possible for user space
> to free potential resources when a domain ID will never show again.
>
> The logged domain properties include:
> - the domain ID
> - creation time
> - its creator's PID
> - its creator's UID
> - its creator's executable path (exe)
> - its creator's command line (comm)
>
> This require each domain to save some task properties at creation time:
> time, PID, credentials, exe path, and comm.
>
> It should be noted that we cannot use audit event's serial numbers
> because there may not be any related event. However, it is still useful
> to use the same potential timestamp instead of a close one. What really
> matter is how old the related Landlock domain is, not the uniquiness of
> the creation time. If audit is not enabled, Landlock creates its own
> timestamp. This timestamp will be exposed to user space with a future
> unprivileged interface.
>
> Audit event sample for a first denial:
>
> type=LL_DENY msg=audit(1732186800.349:44): domain=195ba459b blockers=ptrace opid=1 ocomm="systemd"
> type=LL_DOM_INFO msg=audit(1732186800.349:44): domain=195ba459b creation=1732186800.345 pid=300 uid=0 exe="/root/sandboxer" comm="sandboxer"
> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1732186800.349:44): arch=c000003e syscall=101 success=no [...] pid=300 auid=0
As mentioned in patch 9/23, I don't want subsystems external to audit
to access the audit timestamp information, so the "creation=" field
in the audit event would need to be removed. Assuming that the timestamp
was used either to reference the original domain creation and/or simply
provide some additional information for analysis, all of that information
should already be in the audit log, assuming of course that you are
logging domain creation (which you should, at least as an option).
Also, is there a good reason why the LL_DOM_INFO information can't be
recorded in the LL_DENY (or LL_ACCESS) record? I think that would be
preferable.
> Audit event sample for logged domains deletion:
>
> type=LL_DOM_DROP msg=audit(1732186800.393:45): domain=195ba459b
>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241122143353.59367-11-mic@digikod.net
> ---
> Questions:
> - Should we also log the creator's loginuid?
> - Should we also log the creator's sessionid?
Creation of a Landlock domain can only happen through the Landlock
syscalls, yes? If so, that information should already be logged in
the associated syscall record (see the "auid=" and "ses=" fields )and
we generally try to avoid duplicating information across records in
the same audit event.
> Changes since v2:
> - Fix docstring.
> - Fix log_status check in log_hierarchy() to also log
> LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED.
> - Add audit's creation time to domain's properties.
> - Use hexadecimal notation for domain IDs.
> - Remove domain's parent records: parent domains are not really useful
> in the logs. They will be available with the upcoming introspection
> feature though.
> - Extend commit message with audit's timestamp explanation.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add a ruleset's version for atomic logs.
> - Rebased on the TCP patch series.
> - Rename operation using "_" instead of "-".
> - Rename AUDIT_LANDLOCK to AUDIT_LANDLOCK_RULESET.
> - Only log when audit is enabled, but always set domain IDs.
> - Don't log task's PID/TID with log_task() because it would be redundant
> with the SYSCALL record.
> - Remove race condition when logging ruleset creation and logging
> ruleset modification while the related file descriptor was already
> registered but the ruleset creation not logged yet.
> - Fix domain drop logs.
> - Move the domain drop record from the previous patch into this one.
> - Do not log domain creation but log first domain use instead.
> - Save task's properties that sandbox themselves.
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 +
> security/landlock/audit.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/landlock/audit.h | 7 ++++
> security/landlock/domain.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++
> security/landlock/domain.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 7 ++++
> security/landlock/ruleset.h | 1 +
> security/landlock/syscalls.c | 1 +
> 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 60c909c396c0..a72f7b3403be 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@
> #define AUDIT_IPE_CONFIG_CHANGE 1421 /* IPE config change */
> #define AUDIT_IPE_POLICY_LOAD 1422 /* IPE policy load */
> #define AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DENY 1423 /* Landlock denial */
> +#define AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_INFO 1424 /* Landlock domain properties */
> +#define AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_DROP 1425 /* Landlock domain release */
See my comment about regarding AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_INFO.
Similar to my previous comments regarding AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DENY, it might
be a good idea to change AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_DROP to simply
AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM and use an "op=" field to indicate a drop, creation,
or other event.
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
> index eab6b3a8a231..2d0a96797dd4 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
> @@ -8,8 +8,11 @@
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> #include <linux/audit.h>
> #include <linux/lsm_audit.h>
> +#include <linux/pid.h>
> +#include <linux/uidgid.h>
>
> #include "audit.h"
> +#include "cred.h"
> #include "domain.h"
> #include "ruleset.h"
>
> @@ -30,6 +33,41 @@ static void log_blockers(struct audit_buffer *const ab,
> audit_log_format(ab, "%s", get_blocker(type));
> }
>
> +static void log_node(struct landlock_hierarchy *const node)
> +{
> + struct audit_buffer *ab;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!node))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Ignores already logged domains. */
> + if (READ_ONCE(node->log_status) == LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED)
> + return;
> +
> + ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_ATOMIC,
> + AUDIT_LANDLOCK_DOM_INFO);
> + if (!ab)
> + return;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(node->id == 0);
It seems like you might want to move the WARN_ON assertion up with the
other WARN_ON check?
> + audit_log_format(ab, "domain=%llx creation=%llu.%03lu pid=%d uid=%u",
> + node->id,
> + /* See audit_log_start() */
> + (unsigned long long)node->creation.tv_sec,
> + node->creation.tv_nsec / 1000000, pid_nr(node->pid),
> + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, node->cred->uid));
> + audit_log_d_path(ab, " exe=", &node->exe);
> + audit_log_format(ab, " comm=");
> + audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, node->comm);
> + audit_log_end(ab);
> +
> + /*
> + * There may be race condition leading to logging of the same domain
> + * several times but that is OK.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(node->log_status, LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED);
> +}
> +
> static struct landlock_hierarchy *
> get_hierarchy(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain, const size_t layer)
> {
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-05 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-22 14:33 [PATCH v3 00/23] Landlock audit support Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] lsm: Only build lsm_audit.c if CONFIG_SECURITY and CONFIG_AUDIT are set Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-04 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/23] " Paul Moore
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] lsm: Add audit_log_lsm_data() helper Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/23] " Paul Moore
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] landlock: Factor out check_access_path() Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] landlock: Add unique ID generator Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] landlock: Move access types Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] landlock: Simplify initially denied access rights Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] landlock: Move domain hierarchy management Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] landlock: Log ptrace denials Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-20 14:36 ` Francis Laniel
2024-12-24 14:48 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` [PATCH v3 8/23] " Paul Moore
2025-01-06 14:45 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] audit: Add a new audit_get_ctime() helper Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` [PATCH v3 9/23] " Paul Moore
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] landlock: Log domain properties and release Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-01-06 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-06 21:56 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-07 14:16 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] landlock: Log mount-related denials Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] landlock: Align partial refer access checks with final ones Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] selftests/landlock: Add test to check partial access in a mount tree Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] landlock: Optimize file path walks and prepare for audit support Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] landlock: Log file-related denials Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] landlock: Log truncate and ioctl denials Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] landlock: Log TCP bind and connect denials Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-06 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-06 22:29 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-07 14:17 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] landlock: Log scoped denials Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-05 1:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-06 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-06 22:33 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-07 14:23 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] landlock: Control log events with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOGLESS Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] samples/landlock: Do not log denials from the sandboxer by default Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-20 14:36 ` Francis Laniel
2024-12-24 14:48 ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] selftests/landlock: Extend tests for landlock_restrict_self()'s flags Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] selftests/landlock: Add tests for audit Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] selftests/landlock: Add audit tests for ptrace Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] Landlock audit support Francis Laniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=237bfe2be7b4ba5d59b3b832c23622bb@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=akhna@google.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=czaffery@roblox.com \
--cc=enlightened@google.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fahimitahera@gmail.com \
--cc=flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffxu@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jorgelo@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=prapal@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=robert.salvet@roblox.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).