From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09254C00140 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 02:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233697AbiHCCeG (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 22:34:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52618 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230348AbiHCCeF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 22:34:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145E1EAC0 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 19:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1659494043; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NfwT9+DKgt5KFT0+SHG/ijwTJyDJ1NCJzxhIr/kPWCA=; b=gG65v/hJv/xIbeqAzAlBEZtonlyImCii6i4b7xD/dzDsTL7zkESte96XxQ/vGLujVVSh7F 42AZZo6AICV//pw1s9qg9ikQwzVjH1YQO+J6Qfz37aa+uuL0zewLZNlCstW4cjq2gLUOJt ObcARYsDJDyEzKZQWxf+zPMJNlUMQEA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-269-eDOHdqxQOc2Cl54yr-Jqsg-1; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:34:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eDOHdqxQOc2Cl54yr-Jqsg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A122185A585; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 02:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x2.localnet (unknown [10.22.32.88]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A1990A11; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 02:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Steve Grubb To: Casey Schaufler , linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: John Johansen , SElinux list , James Morris , Mimi Zohar , LSM List , linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Moore Subject: Re: LSM stacking in next for 6.1? Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:34:00 -0400 Message-ID: <2642904.mvXUDI8C0e@x2> Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: References: <791e13b5-bebd-12fc-53de-e9a86df23836.ref@schaufler-ca.com> <791e13b5-bebd-12fc-53de-e9a86df23836@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:56:21 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote: > I can tell you that I've never been really excited about the /proc > changes, and believe it or not I've been thinking about those a fair > amount since James asked me to start maintaining the LSM. Why do we not have auid and sessionid in /proc//status ? This has been needed for 10 - 15 years. -Steve