From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
roberto.sassu@huawei.com, amir73il@gmail.com, miklos@szeredi.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] evm: Use the real inode's metadata to calculate metadata hash
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:10:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38230b4c-54ae-45ed-a6fb-34e63501e5b1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130214620.3155380-5-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/30/24 16:46, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Changes to the file attribute (mode bits, uid, gid) on the lower layer
> are not take into account when d_backing_inode() is used when a file is
> accessed on the overlay layer and this file has not yet been copied up.
> This is because d_backing_inode() does not return the real inode of the
> lower layer but instead returns the backing inode which holds old file
> attributes. When the old file attributes are used for calculating the
> metadata hash then the expected hash is calculated and the file then
> mistakenly passes signature verification. Therefore, use d_real_inode()
> which returns the inode of the lower layer for as long as the file has
> not been copied up and returns the upper layer's inode otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> index b1ffd4cc0b44..2e48fe54e899 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
> size_t req_xattr_value_len,
> uint8_t type, struct evm_digest *data)
> {
> - struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
> + struct inode *inode = d_real_inode(dentry);
> struct xattr_list *xattr;
> struct shash_desc *desc;
> size_t xattr_size = 0;
We need this patch when NOT activating CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_METACOPY but
when setting CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_METACOPY=y it has to be reverted... I am
not sure what the solution is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 21:46 [PATCH 0/5] evm: Support signatures on stacked filesystem Stefan Berger
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] security: allow finer granularity in permitting copy-up of security xattrs Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:25 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:25 ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-31 14:56 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 13:35 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-01 14:18 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 11:58 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-01 15:41 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 16:47 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 19:06 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] evm: Implement per signature type decision in security_inode_copy_up_xattr Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] ima: Reset EVM status upon detecting changes to overlay backing file Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:46 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] evm: Use the real inode's metadata to calculate metadata hash Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 2:10 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2024-01-31 13:16 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 15:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 17:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 17:46 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 12:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 13:36 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 14:11 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 20:35 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02 9:24 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 14:59 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02 15:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 16:06 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02 16:17 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 16:30 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 17:25 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] evm: Enforce signatures on unsupported filesystem for EVM_INIT_X509 Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 14:06 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 17:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/5] evm: Support signatures on stacked filesystem Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:52 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38230b4c-54ae-45ed-a6fb-34e63501e5b1@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).