From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evm: stop avoidably reading i_writecount in evm_file_release
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:53:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cd8019f03dae99c4e43b7613df869499ec72e66.camel@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240806133607.869394-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 15:36 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> The EVM_NEW_FILE flag is unset if the file already existed at the time
> of open and this can be checked without looking at i_writecount.
Agreed. EVM_NEW_FILE is not going to be set during the open(), only
before, in evm_post_path_mknod().
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Thanks
Roberto
> Not accessing it reduces traffic on the cacheline during parallel open
> of the same file and drop the evm_file_release routine from second place
> to bottom of the profile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> The context is that I'm writing a patch which removes one lockref
> get/put cycle on parallel open. An operational WIP reduces ping-pong in
> that area and made do_dentry_open skyrocket along with evm_file_release,
> due to i_writecount access. With the patch they go down again and
> apparmor takes the rightful first place.
>
> The patch accounts for about 5% speed up at 20 cores running open3 from
> will-it-scale on top of the above wip. (the apparmor + lockref thing
> really don't scale, that's next)
>
> I would provide better measurements, but the wip is not ready (as the
> description suggests) and I need evm out of the way for the actual
> patch.
>
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index 62fe66dd53ce..309630f319e2 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -1084,7 +1084,8 @@ static void evm_file_release(struct file *file)
> if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || !(mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> return;
>
> - if (iint && atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
> + if (iint && iint->flags & EVM_NEW_FILE &&
> + atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
> iint->flags &= ~EVM_NEW_FILE;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 13:36 [PATCH] evm: stop avoidably reading i_writecount in evm_file_release Mateusz Guzik
2024-08-16 11:53 ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2024-09-23 5:26 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-09-24 11:56 ` Roberto Sassu
2024-10-10 3:00 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cd8019f03dae99c4e43b7613df869499ec72e66.camel@huaweicloud.com \
--to=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).