Re: [PATCH 03/28] ima: Align ima_post_create_tmpfile() definition with LSM infrastructure

[Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>]

On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 10:15 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
> 
> On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 19:18 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > 
> > Change ima_post_create_tmpfile() definition, so that it can be registered
> > as implementation of the post_create_tmpfile hook.
> 
> Since neither security_create_tmpfile() nor
> security_post_create_tmpfile() already exist, why not pass a pointer to
> the file to conform to the other file related security hooks?

Ok, will change the parameter.

Thanks

Roberto

> Mimi
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/namei.c                        | 2 +-
> >  include/linux/ima.h               | 7 +++++--
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index b5a1ec29193..57727a1ae38 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -3622,7 +3622,7 @@ static int vfs_tmpfile(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  		inode->i_state |= I_LINKABLE;
> >  		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> >  	}
> > -	ima_post_create_tmpfile(idmap, inode);
> > +	ima_post_create_tmpfile(idmap, dir, file_dentry(file), mode);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
> > index 179ce52013b..7535686a403 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ima.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
> > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ extern enum hash_algo ima_get_current_hash_algo(void);
> >  extern int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
> >  extern int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask);
> >  extern void ima_post_create_tmpfile(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > -				    struct inode *inode);
> > +				    struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> > +				    umode_t mode);
> >  extern void ima_file_free(struct file *file);
> >  extern int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long reqprot,
> >  			 unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags);
> > @@ -69,7 +70,9 @@ static inline int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void ima_post_create_tmpfile(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > -					   struct inode *inode)
> > +					   struct inode *dir,
> > +					   struct dentry *dentry,
> > +					   umode_t mode)
> >  {
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > index 8941305376b..4a3d0c8bcba 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > @@ -659,16 +659,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_inode_hash);
> >  /**
> >   * ima_post_create_tmpfile - mark newly created tmpfile as new
> >   * @idmap: idmap of the mount the inode was found from
> > - * @inode: inode of the newly created tmpfile
> > + * @dir: inode structure of the parent of the new file
> > + * @dentry: dentry structure of the new file
> > + * @mode: mode of the new file
> >   *
> >   * No measuring, appraising or auditing of newly created tmpfiles is needed.
> >   * Skip calling process_measurement(), but indicate which newly, created
> >   * tmpfiles are in policy.
> >   */
> >  void ima_post_create_tmpfile(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > -			     struct inode *inode)
> > +			     struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> > +			     umode_t mode)
> >  {
> >  	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> > +	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> >  	int must_appraise;
> >  
> >  	if (!ima_policy_flag || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))