From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
mjg59@google.com, John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] evm: Introduce EVM_RESET_STATUS atomic flag
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:01:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bbf2169cfa38bb7a3d696e582c1de954a82d5c6.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904092643.20013-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
[Cc'ing John Johansen]
Hi Roberto,
On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 11:26 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> When EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set, EVM allows any operation on
> metadata. Its main purpose is to allow users to freely set metadata when
> they are protected by a portable signature, until the HMAC key is loaded.
>
> However, IMA is not notified about metadata changes and, after the first
> successful appraisal, always allows access to the files without checking
> metadata again.
>
> This patch introduces the new atomic flag EVM_RESET_STATUS in
> integrity_iint_cache that is set in the EVM post hooks and cleared in
> evm_verify_hmac(). IMA checks the new flag in process_measurement() and if
> it is set, it clears the appraisal flags.
>
> Although the flag could be cleared also by evm_inode_setxattr() and
> evm_inode_setattr() before IMA sees it, this does not happen if
> EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set. Since the only remaining caller is
> evm_verifyxattr(), this ensures that IMA always sees the flag set before it
> is cleared.
>
> This patch also adds a call to evm_reset_status() in
> evm_inode_post_setattr() so that EVM won't return the cached status the
> next time appraisal is performed.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16.x
> Fixes: ae1ba1676b88e ("EVM: Allow userland to permit modification of EVM-protected metadata")
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index 4e9f5e8b21d5..05be1ad3e6f3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -221,8 +221,15 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
> evm_status = (rc == -ENODATA) ?
> INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> out:
> - if (iint)
> + if (iint) {
> + /*
> + * EVM_RESET_STATUS can be cleared only by evm_verifyxattr()
> + * when EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set. This guarantees that
> + * IMA sees the EVM_RESET_STATUS flag set before it is cleared.
> + */
> + clear_bit(EVM_RESET_STATUS, &iint->atomic_flags);
> iint->evm_status = evm_status;
True IMA is currently the only caller of evm_verifyxattr() in the
upstreamed kernel, but it is an exported function, which may be called
from elsewhere. The previous version crossed the boundary between EVM
& IMA with EVM modifying the IMA flag directly. This version assumes
that IMA will be the only caller. Otherwise, I like this version.
Mimi
> + }
> kfree(xattr_data);
> return evm_status;
> }
> @@ -418,8 +425,12 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode)
> struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
>
> iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> - if (iint)
> + if (iint) {
> + if (evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES)
> + set_bit(EVM_RESET_STATUS, &iint->atomic_flags);
> +
> iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -513,6 +524,8 @@ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid)
> if (!evm_key_loaded())
> return;
>
> + evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode);
> +
> if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))
> evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 9:23 [PATCH v2 00/12] IMA/EVM fixes Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ima: Don't ignore errors from crypto_shash_update() Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ima: Remove semicolon at the end of ima_get_binary_runtime_size() Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] evm: Check size of security.evm before using it Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when the HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2020-09-16 16:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid appraisal Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if the HMAC key is loaded Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] evm: Introduce EVM_RESET_STATUS atomic flag Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 12:01 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-09-17 17:36 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 17:47 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures if check fails Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 12:32 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() if metadata digest won't change Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 13:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Roberto Sassu
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ima: Introduce template field evmsig and write to field sig as fallback Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 14:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-17 15:05 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-09-17 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-04 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised Roberto Sassu
2020-09-16 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] IMA/EVM fixes Mimi Zohar
2020-09-17 14:33 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bbf2169cfa38bb7a3d696e582c1de954a82d5c6.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).