public inbox for linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Egorenkov	 <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen	 <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin	 <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger	 <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"	
	<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin	 <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn"	 <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	open list	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"open list:S390 ARCHITECTURE" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:EXTENSIBLE FIRMWARE INTERFACE (EFI)"	
	<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"	
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS_INTEGRITY"	 <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] integrity: Make arch_ima_get_secureboot integrity-wide
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:43:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66f9d13875e81a965984e2a661e992a3fe43c516.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203041434.872784-2-coxu@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2026-02-03 at 12:14 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> EVM and other LSMs need the ability to query the secure boot status of
> the system, without directly calling the IMA arch_ima_get_secureboot
> function. Refactor the secure boot status check into a general function
> named arch_get_secureboot.
> 
> Reported-and-suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>

Thanks, Coiby.  Other than unnecessarily splitting a line, the patch set looks
good.  As soon as the open window closes, I'll queue these patches for linux-
next.

> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> index 138029bfcce1..27521d665d33 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> @@ -2,52 +2,9 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2018 IBM Corporation
>   */
> -#include <linux/efi.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/ima.h>
> -#include <asm/efi.h>
> -
> -#ifndef arch_ima_efi_boot_mode
> -#define arch_ima_efi_boot_mode efi_secureboot_mode_unset
> -#endif
> -
> -static enum efi_secureboot_mode get_sb_mode(void)
> -{
> -	enum efi_secureboot_mode mode;
> -
> -	if (!efi_rt_services_supported(EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_VARIABLE)) {
> -		pr_info("ima: secureboot mode unknown, no efi\n");
> -		return efi_secureboot_mode_unknown;
> -	}
> -
> -	mode = efi_get_secureboot_mode(efi.get_variable);
> -	if (mode == efi_secureboot_mode_disabled)
> -		pr_info("ima: secureboot mode disabled\n");
> -	else if (mode == efi_secureboot_mode_unknown)
> -		pr_info("ima: secureboot mode unknown\n");
> -	else
> -		pr_info("ima: secureboot mode enabled\n");
> -	return mode;
> -}
> -
> -bool arch_ima_get_secureboot(void)
> -{
> -	static enum efi_secureboot_mode sb_mode;
> -	static bool initialized;
> -
> -	if (!initialized && efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
> -		sb_mode = arch_ima_efi_boot_mode;
> -
> -		if (sb_mode == efi_secureboot_mode_unset)
> -			sb_mode = get_sb_mode();
> -		initialized = true;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (sb_mode == efi_secureboot_mode_enabled)
> -		return true;
> -	else
> -		return false;
> -}
> +#include <linux/secure_boot.h>
>  
>  /* secureboot arch rules */
>  static const char * const sb_arch_rules[] = {
> @@ -67,7 +24,8 @@ static const char * const sb_arch_rules[] = {
>  
>  const char * const *arch_get_ima_policy(void)
>  {
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) &&
> +	    arch_get_secureboot()) {

No need to split the line here or below.


>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
>  			set_module_sig_enforced();
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG))
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 5770cf691912..6d093ac82a45 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -949,8 +949,8 @@ static int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id, bool contents)
>  
>  	switch (id) {
>  	case LOADING_KEXEC_IMAGE:
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG)
> -		    && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG) &&
> +		    arch_get_secureboot()) {

===>

Mimi

>  			pr_err("impossible to appraise a kernel image without a file descriptor; try using kexec_file_load syscall.\n");
>  			return -EACCES;
>  		}

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-09 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260203041434.872784-1-coxu@redhat.com>
2026-02-03  4:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] integrity: Make arch_ima_get_secureboot integrity-wide Coiby Xu
2026-02-09 20:43   ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2026-02-12  1:28     ` Coiby Xu
2026-02-12 20:25       ` Mimi Zohar
2026-02-03  4:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] evm: Don't enable fix mode when secure boot is enabled Coiby Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66f9d13875e81a965984e2a661e992a3fe43c516.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox