From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
roberto.sassu@huawei.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
eric.snowberg@oracle.com, jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
sudeep.holla@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, noodles@meta.com,
sebastianene@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] security: ima: call ima_init() again at late_initcall_sync for defered TPM
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:20:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6919248bdc85dac60277fa9d9c83d8bd258ca635.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422162449.1814615-2-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On Wed, 2026-04-22 at 17:24 +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> To generate the boot_aggregate log in the IMA subsystem with TPM PCR values,
> the TPM driver must be built as built-in and
> must be probed before the IMA subsystem is initialized.
>
> However, when the TPM device operates over the FF-A protocol using
> the CRB interface, probing fails and returns -EPROBE_DEFER if
> the tpm_crb_ffa device — an FF-A device that provides the communication
> interface to the tpm_crb driver — has not yet been probed.
>
> To ensure the TPM device operating over the FF-A protocol with
> the CRB interface is probed before IMA initialization,
> the following conditions must be met:
>
> 1. The corresponding ffa_device must be registered,
> which is done via ffa_init().
>
> 2. The tpm_crb_driver must successfully probe this device via
> tpm_crb_ffa_init().
>
> 3. The tpm_crb driver using CRB over FF-A can then
> be probed successfully. (See crb_acpi_add() and
> tpm_crb_ffa_init() for reference.)
>
> Unfortunately, ffa_init(), tpm_crb_ffa_init(), and crb_acpi_driver_init() are
> all registered with device_initcall, which means crb_acpi_driver_init() may
> be invoked before ffa_init() and tpm_crb_ffa_init() are completed.
>
> When this occurs, probing the TPM device is deferred.
> However, the deferred probe can happen after the IMA subsystem
> has already been initialized, since IMA initialization is performed
> during late_initcall, and deferred_probe_initcall() is performed
> at the same level.
>
> To resolve this, call ima_init() again at late_inicall_sync level
> so that let IMA not miss TPM PCR value when generating boot_aggregate
> log though TPM device presents in the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
A lot of change for just detecting whether ima_init() is being called on
late_initcall or late_initcall_sync(), without any explanation for all the other
changes (e.g. ima_init_core).
Please just limit the change to just calling ima_init() twice.
Mimi
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 +-
> security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 10 +++-
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 ++
> security/lsm_init.c | 13 ++++-
> 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index d48bf0ad26f4..88fe105b7f00 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ enum lsm_order {
> * @initcall_fs: LSM callback for fs_initcall setup, optional
> * @initcall_device: LSM callback for device_initcall() setup, optional
> * @initcall_late: LSM callback for late_initcall() setup, optional
> + * @initcall_late_sync: LSM callback for late_initcall_sync() setup, optional
> */
> struct lsm_info {
> const struct lsm_id *id;
> @@ -181,6 +182,7 @@ struct lsm_info {
> int (*initcall_fs)(void);
> int (*initcall_device)(void);
> int (*initcall_late)(void);
> + int (*initcall_late_sync)(void);
> };
>
> #define DEFINE_LSM(lsm) \
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 89ebe98ffc5e..75ee7ad184d0 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ extern int ima_hash_algo_idx __ro_after_init;
> extern int ima_extra_slots __ro_after_init;
> extern struct ima_algo_desc *ima_algo_array __ro_after_init;
>
> +extern bool ima_initialised __ro_after_init;
> +
> extern int ima_appraise;
> extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
> extern const char boot_aggregate_name[];
> @@ -257,7 +259,7 @@ static inline void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name) {}
> extern bool ima_canonical_fmt;
>
> /* Internal IMA function definitions */
> -int ima_init(void);
> +int ima_init(bool late);
> int ima_fs_init(void);
> int ima_add_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry, int violation,
> const char *op, struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> index a2f34f2d8ad7..c28c71090ad2 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
> @@ -115,13 +115,19 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -int __init ima_init(void)
> +int __init ima_init(bool late)
> {
> int rc;
>
> ima_tpm_chip = tpm_default_chip();
> - if (!ima_tpm_chip)
> + if (!ima_tpm_chip) {
> + if (!late) {
> + pr_info("Defer initialisation to the late_initcall_sync stage.\n");
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> +
> pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass!\n");
> + }
>
> rc = integrity_init_keyring(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA);
> if (rc)
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 1d6229b156fb..ac444ee600e2 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ int ima_appraise;
> #endif
>
> int __ro_after_init ima_hash_algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
> +bool ima_initialised __ro_after_init = false;
> static int hash_setup_done;
> static int ima_disabled __ro_after_init;
>
> @@ -1237,6 +1238,35 @@ static int ima_kernel_module_request(char *kmod_name)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS */
>
> +static int __init init_ima_core(bool late)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (ima_initialised)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = ima_init(late);
> + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (err && strcmp(hash_algo_name[ima_hash_algo],
> + CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH) != 0) {
> + pr_info("Allocating %s failed, going to use default hash algorithm %s\n",
> + hash_algo_name[ima_hash_algo], CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
> + hash_setup_done = 0;
> + hash_setup(CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
> + err = ima_init(late);
> + }
> +
> + if (!err) {
> + ima_update_policy_flags();
> + ima_initialised = true;
> + } else
> + ima_disabled = 1;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int __init init_ima(void)
> {
> int error;
> @@ -1250,30 +1280,42 @@ static int __init init_ima(void)
> ima_appraise_parse_cmdline();
> ima_init_template_list();
> hash_setup(CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
> - error = ima_init();
> -
> - if (error && strcmp(hash_algo_name[ima_hash_algo],
> - CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH) != 0) {
> - pr_info("Allocating %s failed, going to use default hash algorithm %s\n",
> - hash_algo_name[ima_hash_algo], CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
> - hash_setup_done = 0;
> - hash_setup(CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
> - error = ima_init();
> - }
> -
> - if (error)
> - return error;
>
> error = register_blocking_lsm_notifier(&ima_lsm_policy_notifier);
> - if (error)
> + if (error) {
> pr_warn("Couldn't register LSM notifier, error %d\n", error);
> + goto disable_ima;
> + }
>
> - if (!error)
> - ima_update_policy_flags();
> + error = init_ima_core(false);
> + if (error) {
> + unregister_blocking_lsm_notifier(&ima_lsm_policy_notifier);
> + goto disable_ima;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
>
> +disable_ima:
> + ima_disabled = 1;
> return error;
> }
>
> +static int __init late_init_ima(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (ima_disabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = init_ima_core(true);
> + if (err) {
> + unregister_blocking_lsm_notifier(&ima_lsm_policy_notifier);
> + ima_disabled = 1;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static struct security_hook_list ima_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_check_security, ima_bprm_check),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_creds_for_exec, ima_bprm_creds_for_exec),
> @@ -1321,4 +1363,6 @@ DEFINE_LSM(ima) = {
> .blobs = &ima_blob_sizes,
> /* Start IMA after the TPM is available */
> .initcall_late = init_ima,
> + /* Start IMA late in case of probing TPM is deferred. */
> + .initcall_late_sync = late_init_ima,
> };
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index bf2d7ba4c14a..c3bcc3521c81 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
> int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> void *lsm_data)
> {
> + if (!ima_initialised)
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> if (event != LSM_POLICY_CHANGE)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 573e2a7250c4..4e5c59beb82a 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -547,13 +547,22 @@ device_initcall(security_initcall_device);
> * security_initcall_late - Run the LSM late initcalls
> */
> static int __init security_initcall_late(void)
> +{
> + return lsm_initcall(late);
> +}
> +late_initcall(security_initcall_late);
> +
> +/**
> + * security_initcall_late_sync - Run the LSM late initcalls sync
> + */
> +static int __init security_initcall_late_sync(void)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - rc = lsm_initcall(late);
> + rc = lsm_initcall(late_sync);
> lsm_pr_dbg("all enabled LSMs fully activated\n");
> call_blocking_lsm_notifier(LSM_STARTED_ALL, NULL);
>
> return rc;
> }
> -late_initcall(security_initcall_late);
> +late_initcall_sync(security_initcall_late_sync);
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 16:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] fix FF-A call failed with pKVM when ff-a driver is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] security: ima: call ima_init() again at late_initcall_sync for defered TPM Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 17:20 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2026-04-22 18:46 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 19:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 21:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 5:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: revert defered_probed when tpm_crb_ffa is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] firmware: arm_ffa: revert ffa_init() initcall level to device_initcall Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6919248bdc85dac60277fa9d9c83d8bd258ca635.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@meta.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox