From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11692C169C4 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 18:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D721C20855 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 18:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=infineon.com header.i=@infineon.com header.b="e1X88G4p" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727567AbfBHSC7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:02:59 -0500 Received: from smtp2.infineon.com ([217.10.52.18]:33528 "EHLO smtp2.infineon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727343AbfBHSC7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:02:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infineon.com; i=@infineon.com; q=dns/txt; s=IFXMAIL; t=1549648977; x=1581184977; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B8F7X7C8DyPdTQ6o+EdfadBAQC7OD4jYvnkZ9TY5acI=; b=e1X88G4pVbN42wv9LZF8Sivppv0EgEHE1A0tjRlz3c3Vi98ASKlaa272 rMYF+oVFZqHYXX4gbMzsa5nucpuk2sDXQcIlfsqHsMEVrpvmevVNyUD/t JI+dsOv1hyI8oF1NyWZdGJbRbn93YXL1spO3RsB39cUWdaubpKvGyxV/v U=; X-SBRS: None X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5900,7806,9161"; a="100091370" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,348,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="100091370" Received: from unknown (HELO mucxv001.muc.infineon.com) ([172.23.11.16]) by smtp2.infineon.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2019 19:02:56 +0100 Received: from MUCSE708.infineon.com (MUCSE708.infineon.com [172.23.7.82]) by mucxv001.muc.infineon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:02:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.154.32.28] (172.23.8.247) by MUCSE708.infineon.com (172.23.7.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1531.3; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:02:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/16] Remove nested TPM operations To: Jarkko Sakkinen CC: Stefan Berger , , , , Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , Tomas Winkler , Tadeusz Struk , Stefan Berger , Nayna Jain References: <20190205224723.19671-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20190206120634.GA4680@linux.intel.com> <3d6fdcc1-8221-2137-fc82-596377cc2fdc@infineon.com> <20190207212912.GD23906@linux.intel.com> <0af40351-91d5-d0a7-2965-0a9c6505af79@linux.ibm.com> <20190208003314.GB7202@linux.intel.com> <1fbd29ad-1005-8450-4c39-00974468183b@linux.ibm.com> <9cd734ad-ea9d-77f7-b657-3f0910a9d92f@linux.ibm.com> <515b6c56-59e9-468d-35e0-3ae183bcea8c@infineon.com> <20190208140952.GB25255@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Steffen Message-ID: <75ea8364-9381-5d2c-6f8c-cb149780c416@infineon.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:02:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190208140952.GB25255@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.23.8.247] X-ClientProxiedBy: MUCSE716.infineon.com (172.23.7.67) To MUCSE708.infineon.com (172.23.7.82) Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On 08.02.2019 15:09, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:28:50PM +0100, Alexander Steffen wrote: >> Applying those changes fixes all the issues I saw, thanks. I'll retest >> Jarkko's tree without custom patches, once you've agreed on the rc question. > > Just send a two patch patch set how I believe the regression should > be properly fixed. > > Do not have right now dTPM at hand (the NUC that has one does not > respond SSH for some reason) so I need help with testing. Those patches seem to be changing fast :) I'll test them next week. Alexander