linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
	"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:04:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89086cc85ec30c8aaf69149c1a6191dda607b54c.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-48-paul@paul-moore.com>

On Tue, 2025-09-16 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> In addition to style changes, rename set_enabled() to lsm_enabled_set()
> and is_enabled() to lsm_is_enabled() to better fit within the LSM
> initialization code.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johhansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  security/lsm_init.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 87e2147016b3..2cfd72ade6fb 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
>  
>  #include "lsm.h"
>  
> +/* LSM enabled constants. */
> +static __initdata int lsm_enabled_true = 1;
> +static __initdata int lsm_enabled_false = 0;
> +
>  /* Pointers to LSM sections defined in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h */
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_lsm_info[], __end_lsm_info[];
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
> @@ -75,37 +79,33 @@ static int __init lsm_debug_enable(char *str)
>  }
>  __setup("lsm.debug", lsm_debug_enable);
>  
> -/* Mark an LSM's enabled flag. */
> -static int lsm_enabled_true __initdata = 1;
> -static int lsm_enabled_false __initdata = 0;
> -static void __init set_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm, bool enabled)
> +/**
> + * lsm_enabled_set - Mark a LSM as enabled
> + * @lsm: LSM definition
> + * @enabled: enabled flag
> + */
> +static void __init lsm_enabled_set(struct lsm_info *lsm, bool enabled)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * When an LSM hasn't configured an enable variable, we can use
>  	 * a hard-coded location for storing the default enabled state.
>  	 */
> -	if (!lsm->enabled) {
> -		if (enabled)
> -			lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
> -		else
> -			lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_false;
> -	} else if (lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_true) {
> -		if (!enabled)
> -			lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_false;
> -	} else if (lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_false) {
> -		if (enabled)
> -			lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
> +	if (!lsm->enabled ||
> +	    lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_true ||
> +	    lsm->enabled == &lsm_enabled_false) {
> +		lsm->enabled = enabled ? &lsm_enabled_true : &lsm_enabled_false;
>  	} else {
>  		*lsm->enabled = enabled;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool is_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm)
> +/**
> + * lsm_is_enabled - Determine if a LSM is enabled
> + * @lsm: LSM definition
> + */
> +static inline bool lsm_is_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  {
> -	if (!lsm->enabled)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return *lsm->enabled;
> +	return (lsm->enabled ? *lsm->enabled : false);
>  }
>  
>  /* Is an LSM already listed in the ordered LSMs list? */
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
>  	lsm_idlist[last_lsm++] = lsm->id;
>  
>  	init_debug("%s ordered: %s (%s)\n", from, lsm->id->name,
> -		   is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> +		   lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>  }
>  
>  static void __init lsm_set_blob_size(int *need, int *lbs)
> @@ -162,17 +162,17 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  {
>  	struct lsm_blob_sizes *blobs;
>  
> -	if (!is_enabled(lsm)) {
> -		set_enabled(lsm, false);
> +	if (!lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
> +		lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
>  		return;
>  	} else if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && lsm_exclusive) {
>  		init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
> -		set_enabled(lsm, false);
> +		lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Mark the LSM as enabled. */
> -	set_enabled(lsm, true);
> +	lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
>  	if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !lsm_exclusive) {
>  		init_debug("exclusive chosen:   %s\n", lsm->id->name);
>  		lsm_exclusive = lsm;
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  /* Initialize a given LSM, if it is enabled. */
>  static void __init initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  {
> -	if (is_enabled(lsm)) {
> +	if (lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
>  		int ret;
>  
>  		init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->id->name);
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  		lsm_for_each_raw(major) {
>  			if ((major->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) &&
>  			    strcmp(major->id->name, lsm_order_legacy) != 0) {
> -				set_enabled(major, false);
> +				lsm_enabled_set(major, false);
>  				init_debug("security=%s disabled: %s (only one legacy major LSM)\n",
>  					   lsm_order_legacy, major->id->name);
>  			}
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  	lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		if (exists_ordered_lsm(lsm))
>  			continue;
> -		set_enabled(lsm, false);
> +		lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
>  		init_debug("%s skipped: %s (not in requested order)\n",
>  			   origin, lsm->id->name);
>  	}
> @@ -319,12 +319,12 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
>  
>  	pr_info("initializing lsm=");
>  	lsm_early_for_each_raw(early) {
> -		if (is_enabled(early))
> +		if (lsm_is_enabled(early))
>  			pr_cont("%s%s",
>  				first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", early->id->name);
>  	}
>  	lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
> -		if (is_enabled(*lsm))
> +		if (lsm_is_enabled(*lsm))
>  			pr_cont("%s%s",
>  				first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", (*lsm)->id->name);
>  	}
> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  	 */
>  	lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		init_debug("  early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->id->name,
> -			   is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> +			   lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Load LSMs in specified order. */


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-19 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52         ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04   ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-09-30 20:11   ` Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89086cc85ec30c8aaf69149c1a6191dda607b54c.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).